Literature DB >> 15898369

Bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: traits and orthodontic correction.

Daniel A Bills1, Chester S Handelman, Ellen A BeGole.   

Abstract

A group of 48 ethnically diverse patients with bimaxillary protrusion was used to study the pretreatment cephalometric traits of this malocclusion and the effect of orthodontic correction. All patients were treated with four premolar extractions and retraction of the anterior teeth. Pre- and posttreatment lateral cephalograms were evaluated using a series of 18 linear and angular measurements, and the effect of orthodontic correction was determined using paired t-tests. Cephalometric standards were developed for bimaxillary protrusions, which clarify the overall presentation of this malocclusion for clinicians. Patients with bimaxillary protrusion demonstrated increased incisor proclination and protrusion, a vertical facial pattern, increased procumbency of the lips, a decreased nasolabial angle, and thin and elongated upper and lower anterior alveoli. This study also showed that the extraction of four premolars can be extremely successful in reducing the dental and soft tissue procumbency seen in patients with bimaxillary protrusion, thus providing a stronger evidence-based rationale for this treatment modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15898369     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[333:BDPTAO]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  33 in total

1.  Modifications to Increase Efficiency of the Begg Orthodontic Technique.

Authors:  V Sharma; J Sengupta
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

2.  The use of mini-implants in en masse retraction for the treatment of bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.

Authors:  Ali Aljhani; Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2009-12-29

3.  The impact of extraction vs nonextraction treatment on soft tissue changes in Class I borderline malocclusions.

Authors:  Dimitrios Konstantonis
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Anterior alveolar dimensions among different classifications of sagittal jaw relationship in Saudi subjects.

Authors:  Adel Alhadlaq
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2010-02-06

5.  Pretreatment dentoskeletal comparison between individuals treated with extractions in the 1970s and in the new millennium.

Authors:  Rodrigo Naveda; Guilherme Janson; Gabriela Manami Natsumeda; Marcos Roberto de Freitas; Leopoldino Capelozza-Filho; Daniela Garib
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Effect of large incisor retraction on upper airway morphology in adult bimaxillary protrusion patients.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Liu Hong; Chun-ling Wang; Shi-jie Zhang; Cong Cao; Fulan Wei; Tao Lv; Fan Zhang; Dong-xu Liu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Skeletal and soft tissue point A and B changes following orthodontic treatment of Nepalese Class I bimaxillary protrusive patients.

Authors:  Jagan Nath Sharma
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 8.  Soft tissue changes following the extraction of premolars in nongrowing patients with bimaxillary protrusion. A systematic review.

Authors:  Rosalia Leonardi; Alberto Annunziata; Valeria Licciardello; Ersilia Barbato
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  First premolar extraction effects on upper airway dimension in bimaxillary proclination patients.

Authors:  Emad Al Maaitah; Nizar El Said; E S Abu Alhaija
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  SURGICAL AND ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT METHODS IN PATIENTS WITH BIMAXILLARY PROTRUSION - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

Authors:  O K Ogundipe; O D Otuyemi
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.