Literature DB >> 15897738

Ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential (borderline tumors): outcome-based study of 276 patients with long-term (> or =5-year) follow-up.

Teri A Longacre1, Jesse K McKenney, Henry D Tazelaar, Richard L Kempson, Michael R Hendrickson.   

Abstract

The natural history, classification, and nomenclature of ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential (S-LMP) (serous tumors of borderline malignancy, atypical proliferating tumors) are controversial. To determine long-term outcome for patients with S-LMP and further evaluate whether S-LMP can be stratified into clinically benign and malignant groups, the clinicopathologic features of 276 patients with S-LMP and > or =5 year follow-up were studied. The histology of the ovarian primary, extraovarian implants, and recurrent tumor(s) were characterized using World Health Organization criteria and correlated with FIGO stage and clinical follow-up. After censoring nontumor deaths, overall survival and disease-free survival for the 276 patients was 95% (98% FIGO stage I; 91% FIGO II-IV) and 78% (87% FIGO stage I; 65% FIGO stage II-IV), respectively. Unresectable disease (P < 0.001) and invasive implants (P < 0.001) were associated with decreased survival. When compared with typical S-LMP, S-LMP with micropapillary features were more strongly associated with invasive implants (P < 0.008) and decreased overall survival (P = 0.004), but patient outcome with micropapillary S-LMP was not independent of implant type. Stromal microinvasion in the primary tumor was also correlated with adverse outcome, independent of stage of disease, micropapillary architecture, and implant type (P = 0.03). There was no association between outcome and lymph node status. Transformation to low-grade serous carcinoma occurred in 6.8% of patients at intervals of 7 to 288 months (58% > or = 60 months) and was strongly associated with increased tempo of disease and decreased survival (P < 0.001). S-LMP forms a heterogeneous group, morphologically and clinically distinct from benign serous tumors and serous carcinoma. The majority of S-LMP are clinically benign, but recurrences are not uncommon, and persistent disease as well as deaths occur. Progression to low-grade serous carcinoma is highly predictive of more aggressive disease. Other features associated with recurrent and/or progressive disease include FIGO stage, invasive implants, microinvasion in the primary tumor, and micropapillary architecture. These predictors tend to co-occur, and no single clinical or pathologic feature or combination of features identify all adverse outcomes. The small, but significant risk of progression over time to low-grade serous carcinoma emphasizes the need for prolonged follow-up in patients with S-LMP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15897738     DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000164030.82810.db

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  65 in total

1.  Prognosis and prognostic factors of the micropapillary pattern in patients treated for stage II and III serous borderline tumors of the ovary.

Authors:  Catherine Uzan; Aminata Kane; Annie Rey; Sebastien Gouy; Sophie Camatte; Patricia Pautier; Catherine Lhommé; Christine Haie-Meder; Pierre Duvillard; Philippe Morice
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-01-27

Review 2.  Classification of ovarian cancer: a genomic analysis.

Authors:  Michael P Stany; Tomas Bonome; Fred Wamunyokoli; Kristen Zorn; Laurent Ozbun; Dong-Choon Park; Ke Hao; Jeff Boyd; Anil K Sood; David M Gershenson; Ross S Berkowitz; Samuel C Mok; Michael J Birrer
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Coexistence of BRAF V600E and TERT Promoter Mutations in Low-grade Serous Carcinoma of Ovary Recurring as Carcinosarcoma in a Lymph Node: Report of a Case.

Authors:  Mahkam Tavallaee; David F Steiner; James L Zehnder; Ann K Folkins; Amer K Karam
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 4.  Ovarian low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma: pathogenesis, clinicopathologic and molecular biologic features, and diagnostic problems.

Authors:  Russell Vang; Ie-Ming Shih; Robert J Kurman
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.875

5.  Recent progress in the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Danijela Jelovac; Deborah K Armstrong
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Micropapillary pattern in newly diagnosed borderline tumors of the ovary: what's in a name?

Authors:  Mario M Leitao
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-01-27

7.  Adhering to the 2014 WHO terminology on borderline ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Jaime Prat
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  The insulin-like growth factor 1 pathway is a potential therapeutic target for low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Erin R King; Zhifei Zu; Yvonne T M Tsang; Michael T Deavers; Anais Malpica; Samuel C Mok; David M Gershenson; Kwong-Kwok Wong
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  KRAS (but not BRAF) mutations in ovarian serous borderline tumour are associated with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Yvonne T Tsang; Michael T Deavers; Charlotte C Sun; Suet-Yan Kwan; Eric Kuo; Anais Malpica; Samuel C Mok; David M Gershenson; Kwong-Kwok Wong
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.996

10.  PAX2 expression in low malignant potential ovarian tumors and low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas.

Authors:  Celestine S Tung; Samuel C Mok; Yvonne T M Tsang; Zhifei Zu; Huijuan Song; Jinsong Liu; Michael T Deavers; Anais Malpica; Judith K Wolf; Karen H Lu; David M Gershenson; Kwong-Kwok Wong
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 7.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.