Marianne Sunde1, Madelaine Norström. 1. Section of Bacteriology and Norwegian Zoonosis Centre, National Veterinary Institute, Oslo. marianne.sunde@vetinst.no
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the genetic background for streptomycin resistance in Escherichia coli and perform analysis of the MICs in relation to genetic background. METHODS: The 136 strains investigated, with streptomycin MICs of > or =16 mg/L, originated from meat and meat products and were collected within the frame of the Norwegian monitoring programme for antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from feed, food and animals (NORM-VET). PCR was carried out for detection of the streptomycin resistance genes strA-strB and the integron-associated aadA gene cassettes. RESULTS: The strA-strB genes and/or an aadA gene cassette were detected in 110 of the 136 (80.9%) strains investigated. The strA-strB genes were the most prevalent, and were detected in 90 strains. The aadA gene cassettes were detected in 29 strains, and nine strains harboured both the strA-strB genes and an aadA gene cassette. The distribution of MICs differed considerably between isolates harbouring the strA-strB genes (solely) (MIC(50) = 128 mg/L) and isolates harbouring an aadA gene cassette (solely) (MIC(50) = 16 mg/L). Strains harbouring both the strA-strB genes and an aadA gene cassette had higher streptomycin MICs than those harbouring either alone. CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of streptomycin MICs in E. coli can be greatly influenced by the genes encoding resistance to streptomycin. The strA-strB genes are probably involved in conferring high-level resistance to streptomycin, whereas the opposite seems to be the case for the aadA gene cassettes. The low-level streptomycin resistance, caused by the presence of aadA gene cassettes in integrons, represents an obstacle in classifying E. coli as susceptible or resistant to streptomycin. Furthermore, the determination of an epidemiological cut-off value for surveillance purposes is also complicated by dissemination of integrons containing the aadA cassettes.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the genetic background for streptomycin resistance in Escherichia coli and perform analysis of the MICs in relation to genetic background. METHODS: The 136 strains investigated, with streptomycin MICs of > or =16 mg/L, originated from meat and meat products and were collected within the frame of the Norwegian monitoring programme for antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from feed, food and animals (NORM-VET). PCR was carried out for detection of the streptomycin resistance genes strA-strB and the integron-associated aadA gene cassettes. RESULTS: The strA-strB genes and/or an aadA gene cassette were detected in 110 of the 136 (80.9%) strains investigated. The strA-strB genes were the most prevalent, and were detected in 90 strains. The aadA gene cassettes were detected in 29 strains, and nine strains harboured both the strA-strB genes and an aadA gene cassette. The distribution of MICs differed considerably between isolates harbouring the strA-strB genes (solely) (MIC(50) = 128 mg/L) and isolates harbouring an aadA gene cassette (solely) (MIC(50) = 16 mg/L). Strains harbouring both the strA-strB genes and an aadA gene cassette had higher streptomycin MICs than those harbouring either alone. CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of streptomycin MICs in E. coli can be greatly influenced by the genes encoding resistance to streptomycin. The strA-strB genes are probably involved in conferring high-level resistance to streptomycin, whereas the opposite seems to be the case for the aadA gene cassettes. The low-level streptomycin resistance, caused by the presence of aadA gene cassettes in integrons, represents an obstacle in classifying E. coli as susceptible or resistant to streptomycin. Furthermore, the determination of an epidemiological cut-off value for surveillance purposes is also complicated by dissemination of integrons containing the aadA cassettes.
Authors: Song He Zhang; Xiaoyang Lv; Bing Han; Xiucong Gu; Pei Fang Wang; Chao Wang; Zhenli He Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2015-03-27 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: A K Graves; L Liwimbi; D W Israel; E van Heugten; B Robinson; C W Cahoon; J F Lubbers Journal: Folia Microbiol (Praha) Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 2.099
Authors: M V K S Wickramanayake; P S Dahanayake; Sabrina Hossain; Mahanama De Zoysa; Gang-Joon Heo Journal: Curr Microbiol Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 2.188
Authors: Leigh B Rosengren; Cheryl L Waldner; Richard J Reid-Smith; Sylvia L Checkley; Margaret E McFall; Andrijana Rajić Journal: Can J Vet Res Date: 2008 Impact factor: 1.310
Authors: Ilona Stefańska; Ewelina Kwiecień; Katarzyna Jóźwiak-Piasecka; Monika Garbowska; Marian Binek; Magdalena Rzewuska Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2021-07-01