Literature DB >> 15897021

Effects of damage morphology on cortical bone fragility.

T Diab1, D Vashishth.   

Abstract

Despite a general understanding that bone microdamage has distinct strain dependent morphologies, very little information exists on how different damage morphologies develop and participate in bone fracture. In this study, cortical bone beams were subjected to the primary or tertiary phases of bending fatigue followed by either post-hoc fracture toughness tests or microdamage analysis to determine the sequence in which linear microcracks and diffuse damage form during bending fatigue and how they affect the propensity of bone to fracture. The results demonstrate that, following the primary phase, linear microcracks and diffuse damage are formed on the compressive and tensile sides, respectively (p<0.05). Furthermore, this mode of damage formation results in a greater toughness loss if a fracture crack initiates from the tensile side rather than the compressive side (p<0.05). Continued loading of bone specimens to the tertiary phase, however, leads to further accumulation of damage only on the compressive side (p<0.05), and this mode of damage formation results in a further toughness loss if a fracture crack initiates from the compressive side rather than the tensile side (p<0.05). Thus, cortical bone compartmentalizes the damage morphologies in different regions and the sequence of damage production in different phases of cyclic loading to dissipate energy and resist a catastrophic fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15897021     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  50 in total

1.  Effects of non-enzymatic glycation on cancellous bone fragility.

Authors:  S Y Tang; U Zeenath; D Vashishth
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  Osteocytes--martyrs for integrity of bone strength.

Authors:  E Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Multiscale imaging of bone microdamage.

Authors:  Atharva A Poundarik; Deepak Vashishth
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.417

4.  Effects of the basic multicellular unit and lamellar thickness on osteonal fatigue life.

Authors:  George Pellegrino; Max Roman; J Christopher Fritton
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  The bone diagnostic instrument II: indentation distance increase.

Authors:  Paul Hansma; Patricia Turner; Barney Drake; Eugene Yurtsev; Alexander Proctor; Phillip Mathews; Jason Lulejian; Jason Lelujian; Connor Randall; Jonathan Adams; Ralf Jungmann; Federico Garza-de-Leon; Georg Fantner; Haykaz Mkrtchyan; Michael Pontin; Aaron Weaver; Morton B Brown; Nadder Sahar; Ricardo Rossello; David Kohn
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.523

6.  Hierarchy of Bone Microdamage at Multiple Length Scales.

Authors:  Deepak Vashishth
Journal:  Int J Fatigue       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.186

7.  Age-related differences in the morphology of microdamage propagation in trabecular bone.

Authors:  Jessica O Green; Jason Wang; Tamim Diab; Brani Vidakovic; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The bone diagnostic instrument III: testing mouse femora.

Authors:  Connor Randall; Phillip Mathews; Eugene Yurtsev; Nadder Sahar; David Kohn; Paul Hansma
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.523

Review 9.  Post-yield and failure properties of cortical bone.

Authors:  Uwe Wolfram; Jakob Schwiedrzik
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-08-24

Review 10.  Bone microdamage: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  R D Chapurlat; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.