OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of point-of-care (POC) measurements of capillary blood glucose and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels in a remote Aboriginal community with high diabetes prevalence. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study comparing POC capillary glucose and HbA(1c) results with those from corresponding venous samples measured in a reference laboratory. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: 152 residents aged 11-76 years (representing 76% of population aged over 11 years) had POC glucose measurement in November 2003; 88 with POC glucose level > or = 5.0 mmol/L, or self-reported diabetes, had POC HbA(1c) and laboratory glucose and HbA(1c) measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: POC fasting capillary levels of glucose (HemoCue Glucose 201 analyser, Medipac Scientific, Sydney) and HbA(1c) (DCA 2000+ analyser, Bayer Australia, Melbourne); correlation and mean difference between capillary POC and venous blood laboratory measurements of glucose and HbA(1c). RESULTS: Mean and median POC capillary glucose levels were 7.99 mmol/L and 6.25 mmol/L, respectively, while mean and median laboratory venous plasma glucose concentrations were 7.63 mmol/L and 5.35 mmol/L. Values for POC capillary HbA(1c) and laboratory HbA(1c) were identical: mean, 7.06%; and median, 6.0%. The correlation coefficient r for POC and laboratory results was 0.98 for glucose and 0.99 for HbA(1c). The mean difference in results was 0.36 mmol/L for glucose (95% CI, 0.13-0.62; limits of agreement [LOA], - 2.07 to 2.79 mmol/L; P = 0.007) and < 0.01% for HbA(1c) (95% CI, - 0.07% to 0.07%; LOA, - 0.66% to 0.66%; P = 0.95), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: POC capillary HbA(1c) testing, in particular, offers an accurate, practical, community-friendly way of monitoring diabetes in rural and remote clinical settings. POC capillary glucose results should be confirmed by a laboratory test of venous plasma if the results are likely to significantly influence clinical decisions.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of point-of-care (POC) measurements of capillary blood glucose and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels in a remote Aboriginal community with high diabetes prevalence. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study comparing POC capillary glucose and HbA(1c) results with those from corresponding venous samples measured in a reference laboratory. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: 152 residents aged 11-76 years (representing 76% of population aged over 11 years) had POC glucose measurement in November 2003; 88 with POC glucose level > or = 5.0 mmol/L, or self-reported diabetes, had POC HbA(1c) and laboratory glucose and HbA(1c) measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: POC fasting capillary levels of glucose (HemoCue Glucose 201 analyser, Medipac Scientific, Sydney) and HbA(1c) (DCA 2000+ analyser, Bayer Australia, Melbourne); correlation and mean difference between capillary POC and venous blood laboratory measurements of glucose and HbA(1c). RESULTS: Mean and median POC capillary glucose levels were 7.99 mmol/L and 6.25 mmol/L, respectively, while mean and median laboratory venous plasma glucose concentrations were 7.63 mmol/L and 5.35 mmol/L. Values for POC capillary HbA(1c) and laboratory HbA(1c) were identical: mean, 7.06%; and median, 6.0%. The correlation coefficient r for POC and laboratory results was 0.98 for glucose and 0.99 for HbA(1c). The mean difference in results was 0.36 mmol/L for glucose (95% CI, 0.13-0.62; limits of agreement [LOA], - 2.07 to 2.79 mmol/L; P = 0.007) and < 0.01% for HbA(1c) (95% CI, - 0.07% to 0.07%; LOA, - 0.66% to 0.66%; P = 0.95), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: POC capillary HbA(1c) testing, in particular, offers an accurate, practical, community-friendly way of monitoring diabetes in rural and remote clinical settings. POC capillary glucose results should be confirmed by a laboratory test of venous plasma if the results are likely to significantly influence clinical decisions.
Authors: Sjoerd A A van den Berg; Monique J M de Groot; Lorenzo P W Salden; Patrick J G J Draad; Ineke M Dijkstra; Simone Lunshof; Sjoerd W van Thiel; Kristel J M Boonen; Marc H M Thelen Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 4.379