Literature DB >> 15895220

Filling cystoureterography facilitates stone visualization in patients with previously inserted double-J ureteral stents.

Sergey George Kravchick1, Dmitry Shumalinsky, Michael Jeshurun-Koren, Eugen Stepnov, Shmuel Cytron.   

Abstract

In our study, we assessed the ability of a filling cystogram to induce vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and to evaluate its role in stone targeting during ESWL in the presence of a double-J ureteral stent (JJ-S). Filling cystoureterography was performed during ESWL in 17 patients with previously inserted 4.7 F JJ-S. The examination ended with stone localization. In every procedure, 3,500 shock waves were delivered with an energy range of 18-23 kV. Patients were evaluated 4 weeks after ESWL. A stone-free result was defined as no evidence of calculi in the first or second visits. Because contrast material was employed in this study, we also evaluated its possible interference with the results of lithotripsy. All radiolucent or poorly calcified stones were successfully localized. In four patients, rhythmic suprapubic manual pressure was performed to initiate VUR. Reflux was low grade in 35% and high grade in 65% of renal units. The efficiency quotient reached 59%. In vitro artificial stones were successfully disintegrated both in water and solutions of Ultravist. In the presence of a JJ-S, filling cystography can easily localize radiolucent stones during SWL. No special catheters or stents are required for this technique. Ultravist in particular does not affect the results of ESWL unfavorably.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15895220     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-004-0449-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  9 in total

1.  Shock wave lithotripsy treatment of radiolucent ureteric calculi with the help of contrast medium.

Authors:  N P Buchholz; M van Rossum
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Vesicoureteral reflux in patients with double pigtail stents.

Authors:  H A Mosli; H M Farsi; M F al-Zimaity; T R Saleh; M M al-Zamzami
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Injectable internal ureteral stent.

Authors:  L J Gross; G E Brannen
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Bolus injection v drip infusion contrast administration for ureteral stone targeting during shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  M S Pearle; B L McClennan; C G Roehrborn; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and stents: fluoroscopic observations and a hypothesis on the mechanisms of stent function.

Authors:  H Fine; R L Gordon; P D Lebensart
Journal:  Urol Radiol       Date:  1989

6.  Emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for obstructing ureteral stones.

Authors:  M Tligui; M R El Khadime; K Tchala; F Haab; O Traxer; B Gattegno; P Thibault
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  The radiolucent ureteric calculus at the end of a contrast-medium column: where to focus the shock waves.

Authors:  N P Buchholz; M Van Rossum
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Comparison of clinical outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with radiopaque v radiolucent ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Ersin Cimentepe; Ali Unsal; Remzi Saglam; M Derya Balbay
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  An effective technique to facilitate radiographic stone visualization with an internal stent during shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  C P Sundaram; B Saltzman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.450

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.