OBJECTIVE: Antiestrogens reduce the risk of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) but not ER-negative (ER-) breast cancer. Women at high risk of ER+ cancer would be the most likely to benefit from these treatments, but the best approach to predicting ER+ cancer is uncertain. METHODS: We prospectively assessed putative risk factors for breast cancer and archived serum at -190 degrees C from a community-based cohort of 7,676 women ages > or =65 years who had no history of breast cancer. Follow-up for breast cancer over 10.5 years was 99% complete. Using a case-cohort design, we measured baseline levels of estradiol and testosterone in 196 cases of invasive ER+ cancer and 378 randomly selected controls. RESULTS: Women whose testosterone level in highest two quintiles had a 4-fold increased risk of ER+ breast cancer (P < 0.0001). High estradiol concentration also indicated an increased risk but was not a significant predictor after adjustment for testosterone. Women with >16 years of education had a 2.1 times increased risk (P = 0.03) of ER+ cancer, but no other risk factors were significantly related to an increased risk of ER+ cancer. Women with a family history of breast cancer had a 2.9-fold increased risk of ER- cancer (P = 0.002) but no increased risk of ER+ cancer (relative hazard = 1.2, 0.8-1.8). CONCLUSIONS: High serum testosterone and advanced education predicted ER+ breast cancer. If confirmed, high testosterone level may be more accurate than family history of breast cancer and other conventional risk factors for identifying older women who are most likely to benefit from antiestrogen chemoprevention.
OBJECTIVE: Antiestrogens reduce the risk of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) but not ER-negative (ER-) breast cancer. Women at high risk of ER+ cancer would be the most likely to benefit from these treatments, but the best approach to predicting ER+ cancer is uncertain. METHODS: We prospectively assessed putative risk factors for breast cancer and archived serum at -190 degrees C from a community-based cohort of 7,676 women ages > or =65 years who had no history of breast cancer. Follow-up for breast cancer over 10.5 years was 99% complete. Using a case-cohort design, we measured baseline levels of estradiol and testosterone in 196 cases of invasive ER+ cancer and 378 randomly selected controls. RESULTS:Women whose testosterone level in highest two quintiles had a 4-fold increased risk of ER+ breast cancer (P < 0.0001). High estradiol concentration also indicated an increased risk but was not a significant predictor after adjustment for testosterone. Women with >16 years of education had a 2.1 times increased risk (P = 0.03) of ER+ cancer, but no other risk factors were significantly related to an increased risk of ER+ cancer. Women with a family history of breast cancer had a 2.9-fold increased risk of ER- cancer (P = 0.002) but no increased risk of ER+ cancer (relative hazard = 1.2, 0.8-1.8). CONCLUSIONS: High serum testosterone and advanced education predicted ER+ breast cancer. If confirmed, high testosterone level may be more accurate than family history of breast cancer and other conventional risk factors for identifying older women who are most likely to benefit from antiestrogen chemoprevention.
Authors: Niki L Dimou; Nikos Papadimitriou; Dipender Gill; Sofia Christakoudi; Neil Murphy; Marc J Gunter; Ruth C Travis; Tim J Key; Renee T Fortner; Philip C Haycock; Sarah J Lewis; Kenneth Muir; Richard M Martin; Konstantinos K Tsilidis Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Roni T Falk; Elisabet Gentzschein; Frank Z Stanczyk; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Jonine D Figueroa; Olga B Ioffe; Jolanta Lissowska; Louise A Brinton; Mark E Sherman Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-08-26 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Yiwey Shieh; Donglei Hu; Lin Ma; Scott Huntsman; Charlotte C Gard; Jessica W T Leung; Jeffrey A Tice; Elad Ziv; Karla Kerlikowske; Steven R Cummings Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-08-08 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Ghada N Farhat; Neeta Parimi; Rowan T Chlebowski; Joann E Manson; Garnet Anderson; Alison J Huang; Eric Vittinghoff; Jennifer S Lee; Andrea Z Lacroix; Jane A Cauley; Rebecca Jackson; Deborah Grady; Dorothy S Lane; Lawrence Phillips; Michael S Simon; Steven R Cummings Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Christy G Woolcott; Yurii B Shvetsov; Frank Z Stanczyk; Lynne R Wilkens; Kami K White; Christian Caberto; Brian E Henderson; Loïc Le Marchand; Laurence N Kolonel; Marc T Goodman Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Steven R Cummings; Jeffrey A Tice; Scott Bauer; Warren S Browner; Jack Cuzick; Elad Ziv; Victor Vogel; John Shepherd; Celine Vachon; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Karla Kerlikowske Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2009-03-10 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Xuehong Zhang; Shelley S Tworoger; A Heather Eliassen; Susan E Hankinson Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Jane A Cauley; Lisa Palermo; Molly Vogt; Kristine E Ensrud; Susan Ewing; Marc Hochberg; Michael C Nevitt; Dennis M Black Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Ulla A Hvidtfeldt; Marc J Gunter; Theis Lange; Rowan T Chlebowski; Dorothy Lane; Ghada N Farhat; Matthew S Freiberg; Niels Keiding; Jennifer S Lee; Ross Prentice; Anne Tjønneland; Mara Z Vitolins; Silvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Howard D Strickler; Naja H Rod Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-05-07 Impact factor: 4.254