Literature DB >> 15894416

Does NHS Direct empower patients?

Alicia O'Cathain1, Jackie Goode, Donna Luff, Tim Strangleman, Gerard Hanlon, David Greatbatch.   

Abstract

NHS Direct is a 24h telephone helpline established in England and Wales, UK to offer advice and information for people about health, illness and the National Health Service (NHS) so that they are better able to care for themselves and their families. In 2001/2002 we undertook in-depth home interviews with 60 users of the service in two NHS Direct sites in England. In this paper we consider the extent to which NHS Direct facilitates patient empowerment in terms of helping people to be in control of their health and health care interactions. Our research suggests that NHS Direct facilitates patient empowerment by enabling patients to self care and to access health advice and services. It is also seen to offer the prerequisites for empowerment perceived to be lacking in the wider NHS, including time, respect, listening, support, and information. The service also functions by offering an alternative contact point for people seeking to avoid being labelled 'time wasters' by other busy health care providers. In the context of a wider health service which appears to problematise individuals' ability to make decisions about the appropriateness of seeking health care, NHS Direct legitimises help-seeking actions. Empowerment in the context of NHS Direct has been associated with self care as a way of reducing 'unnecessary' demand on health services. However, health professional and patient perspectives on what is considered necessary demand differ, and in certain contexts, patient empowerment may involve service use as well as self care. Further, our data reveal the context-dependent nature of a concept like empowerment. For example, when people are ill, in pain, or anxious about a loved one, they may value being cared for more than being empowered. Our research suggests that, in addition to its other functions, NHS Direct is also valued as contributing to a sense of being cared for.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15894416     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.03.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  9 in total

1.  Exploring the impact of patient views on 'appropriate' use of services and help seeking: a mixed method study.

Authors:  Joy Adamson; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Nish Chaturvedi; Jenny Donovan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Understanding reactions to an internet-delivered health-care intervention: accommodating user preferences for information provision.

Authors:  Lucy Yardley; Leanne G Morrison; Panayiota Andreou; Judith Joseph; Paul Little
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 3.  How technology is empowering patients? A literature review.

Authors:  Jorge Calvillo; Isabel Román; Laura M Roa
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Barriers and facilitators to using NHS Direct: a qualitative study of 'users' and 'non-users'.

Authors:  Erica J Cook; Gurch Randhawa; Shirley Large; Andy Guppy; Angel M Chater; Nasreen Ali
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  More than what the eye can see: the emotional journey and experience of powerlessness of integrated care service users and their carers.

Authors:  Markella Boudioni; Nina Hallett; Cristina Lora; Wendy Couchman
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 6.  Public perceptions of non-pharmaceutical interventions for reducing transmission of respiratory infection: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Emma Teasdale; Miriam Santer; Adam W A Geraghty; Paul Little; Lucy Yardley
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  A critical analysis of national policies, systems, and structures of patient empowerment in England and Greece.

Authors:  Markella Boudioni; Susan McLaren; Graham Lister
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Mobile consulting (mConsulting) and its potential for providing access to quality healthcare for populations living in low-resource settings of low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Frances Griffiths; Jocelyn Anstey Watkins; Caroline Huxley; Bronwyn Harris; Jonathan Cave; Senga Pemba; Beatrice Chipwaza; Richard Lilford; Motunrayo Ajisola; Theodoros N Arvanitis; Pauline Bakibinga; Muntasir Billah; Nazratun Choudhury; David Davies; Olufunke Fayehun; Caroline Kabaria; Romaina Iqbal; Akinyinka Omigbodun; Eme Owoaje; Omar Rahman; Jo Sartori; Saleem Sayani; Komal Tabani; Rita Yusuf; Jackie Sturt
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2020-04-20

9.  Do healthcare services behave as complex systems? Analysis of patterns of attendance and implications for service delivery.

Authors:  Christopher Burton; Alison Elliott; Amanda Cochran; Tom Love
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 8.775

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.