Literature DB >> 15894347

The role of (micro)saccades and blinks in perceptual bi-stability from slant rivalry.

Loes C J van Dam1, Raymond van Ee.   

Abstract

We exposed the visual system to an ambiguous 3D slant rivalry stimulus consisting of a grid for which monocular (perspective) and binocular (disparity) cues independently specified a slant about a horizontal axis. When those cues specified similar slants, observers perceived a single slant. When the difference between the specified slants was large, observers alternatively perceived a perspective- or a disparity-dominated slant. Eye movement measurements revealed that there was no positive correlation between a perceptual flip and both saccades (microsaccades as well as larger saccades) and blinks that occurred prior to a perceptual flip. We also found that changes in horizontal vergence were not responsible for perceptual flips. Thus, eye movements were not essential to flip from one percept to the other. After the moment of a perceptual flip the occurrence probabilities of both saccades and blinks were reduced. The reduced probability of saccades mainly occurred for larger voluntary saccades, rather than for involuntary microsaccades. We suggest that the reduced probability of voluntary saccades reflects a reset of saccade planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15894347     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  18 in total

1.  The role of frontal and parietal brain areas in bistable perception.

Authors:  Tomas Knapen; Jan Brascamp; Joel Pearson; Raymond van Ee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry.

Authors:  Wolfgang Einhäuser; James Stout; Christof Koch; Olivia Carter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Microsaccades drive illusory motion in the Enigma illusion.

Authors:  Xoana G Troncoso; Stephen L Macknik; Jorge Otero-Millan; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Eye movements while viewing narrated, captioned, and silent videos.

Authors:  Nicholas M Ross; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Influence of retinal image shifts and extra-retinal eye movement signals on binocular rivalry alternations.

Authors:  Joke P Kalisvaart; Jeroen Goossens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Why is Binocular Rivalry Uncommon? Discrepant Monocular Images in the Real World.

Authors:  Derek Henry Arnold
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Perceptual rivalry: reflexes reveal the gradual nature of visual awareness.

Authors:  Marnix Naber; Stefan Frässle; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Competition with and without priority control: linking rivalry to attention through winner-take-all networks with memory.

Authors:  Svenja Marx; Gina Gruenhage; Daniel Walper; Ueli Rutishauser; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Perceptual incongruence influences bistability and cortical activation.

Authors:  Gijs Joost Brouwer; Frank Tong; Peter Hagoort; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.