BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcer prevalence, cost, associated mortality, and potential for litigation are major clinical problems in nursing homes despite guidelines for prevention and treatment. OBJECTIVE: To improve the use of pressure ulcer prevention procedures at nursing homes in Texas through implementation of process of care system changes in collaboration with a state quality improvement organization (QIO). DESIGN: Preintervention and postintervention measurement of performance for process of care quality indicators and of pressure ulcer incidence rates. SETTING: Twenty nursing homes in Texas. PARTICIPANTS: Quality improvement teams at participating nursing homes. MEASUREMENT: Data were abstracted from medical records on performance measures (quality indicators) and pressure ulcer incidence rates between November 2000 and August 2002. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used. INTERVENTIONS: Process of care system changes consisting of tools and education to prevent pressure ulcers were introduced to participating nursing homes. RESULTS: Participating nursing homes showed statistically significant improvement in 8 out of 12 quality indicators. Pressure ulcer incidence rates also decreased, although not quite significantly. Furthermore, facilities with the greatest improvement in quality indicator scores had significantly lower pressure ulcer incidence rates than the facilities with the least improvement in quality indicator scores (S = 131.0, P = .03). This suggests that the interventions positively affected not only the process of care but also led to a decrease in pressure ulcer incidences. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that nursing homes in a collaborative effort with a QIO were able to improve their processes of care. Although significant improvement was noted on most of the quality indicators, opportunity remains for further improvement. Furthermore, these results suggest that implementation of process of care system changes by nursing homes in a collaborative relationship with a QIO may yield improvements in measures of patient outcome (eg, pressure ulcer incidence).
BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcer prevalence, cost, associated mortality, and potential for litigation are major clinical problems in nursing homes despite guidelines for prevention and treatment. OBJECTIVE: To improve the use of pressure ulcer prevention procedures at nursing homes in Texas through implementation of process of care system changes in collaboration with a state quality improvement organization (QIO). DESIGN: Preintervention and postintervention measurement of performance for process of care quality indicators and of pressure ulcer incidence rates. SETTING: Twenty nursing homes in Texas. PARTICIPANTS: Quality improvement teams at participating nursing homes. MEASUREMENT: Data were abstracted from medical records on performance measures (quality indicators) and pressure ulcer incidence rates between November 2000 and August 2002. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used. INTERVENTIONS: Process of care system changes consisting of tools and education to prevent pressure ulcers were introduced to participating nursing homes. RESULTS: Participating nursing homes showed statistically significant improvement in 8 out of 12 quality indicators. Pressure ulcer incidence rates also decreased, although not quite significantly. Furthermore, facilities with the greatest improvement in quality indicator scores had significantly lower pressure ulcer incidence rates than the facilities with the least improvement in quality indicator scores (S = 131.0, P = .03). This suggests that the interventions positively affected not only the process of care but also led to a decrease in pressure ulcer incidences. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that nursing homes in a collaborative effort with a QIO were able to improve their processes of care. Although significant improvement was noted on most of the quality indicators, opportunity remains for further improvement. Furthermore, these results suggest that implementation of process of care system changes by nursing homes in a collaborative relationship with a QIO may yield improvements in measures of patient outcome (eg, pressure ulcer incidence).
Authors: Tracey L Yap; Susan M Kennerly; Nancy Bergstrom; Sandra L Hudak; Susan D Horn Journal: J Nurs Care Qual Date: 2016 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 1.597
Authors: Christine W Hartmann; Jeffrey Solomon; Jennifer A Palmer; Carol VanDeusen Lukas Journal: Adv Skin Wound Care Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 2.347
Authors: Patriek Mistiaen; Wilco Achterberg; Andre Ament; Ruud Halfens; Janneke Huizinga; Ken Montgomery; Henri Post; Anneke L Francke Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2008-01-07 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Tracey L Yap; Susan M Kennerly; Susan D Horn; Nancy Bergstrom; Santanu Datta; Cathleen Colon-Emeric Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Neil H Chadborn; Reena Devi; Kathryn Hinsliff-Smith; Jay Banerjee; Adam L Gordon Journal: Eur Geriatr Med Date: 2020-09-04 Impact factor: 1.710
Authors: Susan M Kennerly; Phoebe D Sharkey; Susan D Horn; Tianyu Zheng; Jenny Alderden; Valerie K Sabol; Meredeth Rowe; Tracey L Yap Journal: Adv Skin Wound Care Date: 2022-05-01 Impact factor: 2.347