Literature DB >> 15893612

New live mycobacterial vaccines: the Geneva consensus on essential steps towards clinical development.

Arun T Kamath1, Uli Fruth, Michael J Brennan, Roland Dobbelaer, Peter Hubrechts, Mei Mei Ho, Ronald E Mayner, Jelle Thole, K Barry Walker, Margaret Liu, Paul-Henri Lambert.   

Abstract

As the disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis continues to be a burden, which the world continues to suffer, there is a concerted effort to find new vaccines to combat this problem. Of the various vaccines strategies, one viable option is the development of live mycobacterial vaccines. A meeting with researchers, regulatory bodies, vaccines developers and manufactures was held to consider the challenges and progress, which has been achieved with live mycobacterial vaccines (either modified BCG or attenuated M. tuberculosis). Discussion led to the production of a consensus document of the proposed entry criteria for Phase I clinical trials of candidate live mycobacterial vaccines. The vaccine must be characterised thoroughly to prove identity and consistency, as clinical trial lots are prepared. In pre-clinical studies, greater protective efficacy as well as improved safety potential relative to BCG should be considered when assessing potential vaccine candidates. A standard way to measure the protective efficacy to facilitate comparison between vaccine candidates was suggested. Additional safety criteria and verification of attenuation must be considered for attenuated M. tuberculosis. Two non-reverting independent mutations are recommended for such vaccines. When entering Phase I trials, enrollment should be based upon an acceptable characterisation of the study population regarding mycobacterium status and exclude HIV(+) individuals. BCG could be used as a comparator for blinding during the trials and to properly assess vaccine-specific adverse reactions, while assays are being developed to assess immunogenicity of vaccines. The proposed criteria suggested in this consensus document may facilitate the movement of the most promising vaccine candidates to the clinic and towards control of tuberculosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15893612     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  42 in total

Review 1.  Tuberculosis vaccines in clinical trials.

Authors:  Rosalind Rowland; Helen McShane
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.217

2.  Preclinical efficacy in therapeutic area guidelines from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Holger Langhof; William Wei Lim Chin; Susanne Wieschowski; Carole Federico; Jonathan Kimmelman; Daniel Strech
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis sigE mutant ST28 used as a vaccine induces protective immunity in the guinea pig model.

Authors:  JoLynn Troudt; Elizabeth Creissen; Linda Izzo; Helle Bielefeldt-Ohmann; Stefano Casonato; Riccardo Manganelli; Angelo A Izzo
Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.131

4.  Protection elicited by two glutamine auxotrophs of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and in vivo growth phenotypes of the four unique glutamine synthetase mutants in a murine model.

Authors:  Sunhee Lee; Bo-Young Jeon; Svetoslav Bardarov; Mei Chen; Sheldon L Morris; William R Jacobs
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Stable Expression of Lentiviral Antigens by Quality-Controlled Recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG Vectors.

Authors:  Bryan E Hart; Rose Asrican; So-Yon Lim; Jaimie D Sixsmith; Regy Lukose; Sommer J R Souther; Swati D G Rayasam; Joseph W Saelens; Ching-Ju Chen; Sarah A Seay; Linda Berney-Meyer; Leslie Magtanong; Kim Vermeul; Priyadharshini Pajanirassa; Amanda E Jimenez; Tony W Ng; David M Tobin; Steven A Porcelli; Michelle H Larsen; Joern E Schmitz; Barton F Haynes; William R Jacobs; Sunhee Lee; Richard Frothingham
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2015-04-29

6.  Characterization of the protective T-cell response generated in CD4-deficient mice by a live attenuated Mycobacterium tuberculosis vaccine.

Authors:  Steven C Derrick; Teresa H Evering; Vasan K Sambandamurthy; Kripa V Jalapathy; Tsungda Hsu; Bing Chen; Mei Chen; Robert G Russell; Ana Paula Junqueira-Kipnis; Ian M Orme; Steven A Porcelli; William R Jacobs; Sheldon L Morris
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 7.397

7.  Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of "Mycobacterium w" against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice immunized with live versus heat-killed M. w by the aerosol or parenteral route.

Authors:  Ankan Gupta; Nishamol Geetha; Jiju Mani; Pramod Upadhyay; V M Katoch; M Natrajan; U D Gupta; Sangeeta Bhaskar
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  A New Vaccine for Tuberculosis: The Challenges of Development and Deployment.

Authors:  Helen A Fletcher; Tony Hawkridge; Helen McShane
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 1.352

9.  Immunological memory transferred with CD4 T cells specific for tuberculosis antigens Ag85B-TB10.4: persisting antigen enhances protection.

Authors:  Darragh Duffy; Amina Dawoodji; Else Marie Agger; Peter Andersen; Jürgen Westermann; Eric B Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  MVA.85A boosting of BCG and an attenuated, phoP deficient M. tuberculosis vaccine both show protective efficacy against tuberculosis in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Frank A W Verreck; Richard A W Vervenne; Ivanela Kondova; Klaas W van Kralingen; Edmond J Remarque; Gerco Braskamp; Nicole M van der Werff; Ariena Kersbergen; Tom H M Ottenhoff; Peter J Heidt; Sarah C Gilbert; Brigitte Gicquel; Adrian V S Hill; Carlos Martin; Helen McShane; Alan W Thomas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.