Literature DB >> 15893214

It's good to talk: comparison of a telephone helpline and website for cancer information.

Rachel Hardyman1, Pollyanna Hardy, Judith Brodie, Richard Stephens.   

Abstract

The Internet plays an important role in the information gathering process for people affected by cancer. This paper presents the results of a study comparing two sources of cancer information; a website and a telephone helpline. Data were captured on the use of one section of the UK charity CancerBACUP's website, and systematically compared to data collected from every fifth user of the charity's helpline. Subjects of enquiry for 994 telephone enquiries and 3096 web enquiries were comparable. The majority of enquiries to both services were about women and/or patients aged 50 or older. Website users were more likely than helpline users to request factual information and less likely to request information on sensitive topics. This study provides valuable information about the types of health information people seek from different sources and how the sources may complement each other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15893214     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  8 in total

1.  Characteristics of midlife women recruited through internet communities/groups.

Authors:  Eun-Ok Im; Hyun Jeong Shin; Wonshik Chee
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Health-related Internet use among cancer survivors: data from the Health Information National Trends Survey, 2003-2008.

Authors:  Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Benmei Liu; Samantha Post; Bradford Hesse
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  How calls from carers, friends and family members of someone affected by cancer differ from those made by people diagnosed with cancer; analysis of 4 years of South Australian Cancer Council Helpline data.

Authors:  Kate M Fennell; L Heckel; C Wilson; M Byrnes; P M Livingston
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Improving modern cancer care through information technology.

Authors:  Steven B Clauser; Edward H Wagner; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Leah Tuzzio; Sarah M Greene
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Stressors and Information-Seeking by Dialysis and Transplant Patients During COVID-19, Reported on a Telephone Hotline: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Yaquelin A Arevalo Iraheta; Ariana L Murillo; Erica W Ho; Shailesh M Advani; LaShara Davis; Amanda Faye Lipsey; Mindy Kim; Amy D Waterman
Journal:  Kidney Med       Date:  2022-05-10

6.  A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of an interactive web-based intervention: CancerCope.

Authors:  Suzanne K Chambers; Lee Ritterband; Frances Thorndike; Lisa Nielsen; Joanne F Aitken; Samantha Clutton; Paul Scuffham; Philippa Youl; Bronwyn Morris; Peter Baade; Jeffrey Dunn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Beating the blues after cancer: randomised controlled trial of a tele-based psychological intervention for high distress patients and carers.

Authors:  Suzanne K Chambers; Afaf Girgis; Stefano Occhipinti; Sandy Hutchison; Jane Turner; Rob Carter; Jeff Dunn
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Impact of individual background on the unmet needs of cancer survivors and caregivers - a mixed-methods analysis.

Authors:  Kaname Watanabe; Kayoko Katayama; Takashi Yoshioka; Hiroto Narimatsu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.