Literature DB >> 15892943

A survey of tools and methods used by certified professional ergonomists.

Patrick G Dempsey1, Raymond W McGorry, Wayne S Maynard.   

Abstract

A survey of Certified Professional Ergonomists (CPEs) was conducted to gather information on the types of basic tools, direct and observational measurement techniques, and software used by practitioners. The motivation for the survey was to better understand what types of tools and methods practitioners use, their opinions of these tools, and to potentially gain an understanding of the constraints or preferences that influence this selection. Reasons for using or not using a selection of tools were also surveyed. Of 578 surveys that were delivered to CPEs and Associate Ergonomics Professionals, 308 were returned for a response rate of 53%. The respondents tended to be biased towards physical ergonomics, as the survey primarily focused on this area of ergonomics. A high percentage of respondents reported using tape measures, video cameras, stopwatches and digital cameras. The most commonly used observational methods were those involving manual materials handling, whereas the most commonly used direct measurement tools were pinch and grip dynamometers and push/pull gauges. The frequency and type of checklists, software, and anthropometric data used are summarized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15892943     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  10 in total

1.  Development of ergonomics audits for bagging, haul truck and maintenance and repair operations in mining.

Authors:  Patrick G Dempsey; Jonisha Pollard; William L Porter; Alan Mayton; John R Heberger; Sean Gallagher; Leanna Reardon; Colin G Drury
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  An observational ergonomic tool for assessing the worn condition of slip-resistant shoes.

Authors:  Kurt E Beschorner; Johanna L Siegel; Sarah L Hemler; Vani H Sundaram; Arnab Chanda; Arian Iraqi; Joel M Haight; Mark S Redfern
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Prediction of coefficient of friction based on footwear outsole features.

Authors:  Arian Iraqi; Natasa S Vidic; Mark S Redfern; Kurt E Beschorner
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Evaluation of alternate category structures for the Strain Index: an empirical analysis.

Authors:  Alysha R Meyers; Fredric Gerr; Nathan B Fethke
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.888

Review 5.  Evaluation of the Impact of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Lifting Equation.

Authors:  Ming-Lun Lu; Vern Putz-Anderson; Arun Garg; Kermit G Davis
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Inter-rater reliability of cyclic and non-cyclic task assessment using the hand activity level in appliance manufacturing.

Authors:  Robert Paulsen; Natalie Schwatka; Jennifer Gober; David Gilkey; Dan Anton; Fred Gerr; John Rosecrance
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.656

7.  Comparing upper arm and trunk kinematics between manufacturing workers performing predominantly cyclic and non-cyclic work tasks.

Authors:  Mark C Schall; Xuanxuan Zhang; Howard Chen; Sean Gallagher; Nathan B Fethke
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.940

8.  Factors influencing ergonomists' use of observation-based risk-assessment tools.

Authors:  Kristina Eliasson; Carl Mikael Lind; Teresia Nyman
Journal:  Work       Date:  2019

9.  Pooling job physical exposure data from multiple independent studies in a consortium study of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Jay M Kapellusch; Arun Garg; Stephen S Bao; Barbara A Silverstein; Susan E Burt; Ann Marie Dale; Bradley A Evanoff; Frederic E Gerr; Carisa Harris-Adamson; Kurt T Hegmann; Linda A Merlino; David M Rempel
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Novel ergonomic postural assessment method (NERPA) using product-process computer aided engineering for ergonomic workplace design.

Authors:  Alberto Sanchez-Lite; Manuel Garcia; Rosario Domingo; Miguel Angel Sebastian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.