Literature DB >> 15891971

Zone I flexor tendon rehabilitation with limited extension and active flexion.

Roslyn B Evans1.   

Abstract

This article describes an immediate active motion protocol for primary repair of zone I flexor tendons treated with tendon to tendon, or tendon to bone repair, and reviews clinical results. A rehabilitation protocol is proposed that will limit excursion of the zone I repair by blocking full distal interphalangeal (DIP) extension and by applying controlled active tension to both the unrepaired flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and the repaired flexor digitorum profundus (FDP). The rehabilitation technique utilized a dorsal protective splint with a relaxed position of immobilization with 30 degrees of wrist flexion, 40 degrees of metacarpophalangeal (MP) joint flexion, and a neutral position for the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints without dynamic traction. In addition, within the confines of the dorsal splint, the involved DIP joint was splinted at 40-45 degrees to prevent DIP joint extension during the early wound healing phases. Relaxed composite flexion was used to apply active tension to both the uninjured FDS, and the repaired FDP. This technique applies excursion of approximately 3 mm to the zone I tendon in a limited arc (45-75 degrees). The modified position of active flexion applies low loads of force (< 500 g), even with drag considered. This technique is supported by previous mathematical studies of excursion and internal tendon force, and clinical experience. Forty nine cases treated over a 10-year period were reviewed, and eight were excluded for incomplete follow-up. The use of this protocol for 41 zone I flexor digitorum profundus repairs by 12 different surgeons using varied surgical techniques was evaluated. None of the tendon to tendon repairs used more than two suture strands for the core repairs. Mean total active range of motion was 142 degrees (PIP 95 degrees plus DIP 47 degrees), or 81% of normal. Three tendons ruptured in non-protocol-related incidents and were excluded from the study. Results from this clinical study support the use of limited DIP extension combined with active tension with conventional repair in zone I.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15891971     DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2005.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Ther        ISSN: 0894-1130            Impact factor:   1.950


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Rehabilitation after flexor tendon injuries of the hand].

Authors:  A Asmus; S Kim; M Millrose; J Jodkowski; A Ekkernkamp; A Eisenschenk
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand.

Authors:  Susan E Peters; Bhavana Jha; Mark Ross
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-01-13

Review 3.  ICF components of corresponding outcome measures in flexor tendon rehabilitation - a systematic review.

Authors:  Renée Oltman; Gudrun Neises; Daniel Scheible; Gerhard Mehrtens; Christian Grüneberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.