Literature DB >> 15891635

Bone cement ossiculoplasty: incus to stapes versus malleus to stapes cement bridge.

Yildirim A Bayazit1, Enver Ozer, Muzaffer Kanlikama, Tuba Durmaz, Metin Yilmaz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study, our purpose was to evaluate results of our experience with bone cement repair of ossicular discontinuity between the incus and stapes and between the malleus and stapes.
METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent surgery for chronic otitis media between March 2000 and December 2002 were evaluated retrospectively. Fifty-seven patients who underwent bone cement ossiculoplasty and had appropriate follow-up data were included in the study. Bone cement reconstruction of the ossicular chain was performed 1) from incus to stapes (I-S) in the absence of long arm or lenticular process of the incus and 2) from malleus to stapes (M-S) in the absence of the incus. The clinical data of the patients were evaluated by otoscopic examination and audiometry.
RESULTS: The graft take rate was 84.1%. I-S procedure was performed in 42 and M-S in 8 patients. Pre- and postoperative PTAs of all patients were compared, which showed a significant improvement in air PTA (p < 0.001) while bone PTA did not change (p > 0.05). In I-S and M-S groups, successful hearing restoration could be achieved in 78.6.1% and 87.5% of the patients, respectively. Hearing results of different aural pathologies (chronic otitis media and conductive hearing loss) and surgeries (tympanotomy and tympanoplasty with or without mastoidectomy) were not significantly different (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Bone cement ossiculoplasty offers cost effective and significant improvement in conductive hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15891635     DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000169781.92211.76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  15 in total

1.  Ossicular reconstruction: hydroxyapatite bone cement versus incus remodelling: how to manage incudostapedial discontinuity.

Authors:  Thomas Somers; Vincent Van Rompaey; Gerd Claes; Liesbeth Salembier; Joost van Dinther; Zarowski Andrzej; Erwin Offeciers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Should the ossicle be denuded prior to the application of glass ionomer cement? An experimental study on rabbit.

Authors:  Gábor Ráth; László Kereskai; Miklós Bauer; Péter Bakó; Víta Bányavölgyi; Imre Gerlinger
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Comparison of glass ionomer cement and incus interposition in reconstruction of incus long process defects.

Authors:  Huseyin Dere; Fatih Ozdogan; K Murat Ozcan; Adin Selcuk; Ibrahim Ozcan; Gokhan Gokturk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Chronic Otitis Media with Granulation Is a Poor Prognostic Factor for Hearing Improvement and Development of Intracranial Complications.

Authors:  Maciej Wiatr; Jacek Skladzien; Pawel Strek; Anna Przeklasa-Muszynska; Agnieszka Wiatr
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.017

5.  The use of bone cement for ossicular chain defects.

Authors:  M Tayyar Kalcioglu; Mehmet Tan; Jelle Fleerakkers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Glass ionomer cement in otological microsurgery: experience over 16 years.

Authors:  F Righini-Grunder; R Häusler; S Chongvisal; M Caversaccio
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Evaluation on shear bond strength of different glass ionomer and hydroxy apatite cements used in ossiculoplasty.

Authors:  M Tayyar Kalcıoğlu; İsmail Hakkı Uzun; Muhammet Yalçın; Meral Arslan Malkoç; Ayşe Tuba Öğreten; Fatih Mehmet Hanege
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.021

8.  Ossiculoplasty with hydroxyapatite bone cement: our reconstruction philosophy.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Gérard; Gersende De Bie; Daniel Franceschi; Naima Deggouj; Michel Gersdorff
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Comparison of incus interpositioning technique versus glass ionomer cement application in type 2 tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Haşmet Yazıcı; Hakkı Uzunkulaoğlu; Hatice Karadas Emir; Zeynep Kızılkaya; Sedat Doğan; Erdal Samim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Endoscopic transcanal management of incus long process defects: rebridging with bone cement versus incus interposition.

Authors:  Waleed Moneir; Mohammed Abdelbadie Salem; Ahmed Hemdan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.