Saleh M Ibrahim1, Ralf Gold. 1. Department of Immunology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany. saleh.ibrahim@med.uni-rostock.de
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic inflammatory neurological disease. Despite major advances the aetiology of this disease it is still not completely understood. In the post-genome era, advances in global screening technologies offer an opportunity to accelerate the search of new pathological pathways and to identify new therapeutic targets. Some recent publications using novel global screening methods at the genome, transcriptome, proteome and metabolome levels are discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: The genetic association of susceptibility to MS with loci outside the MHC has been reconfirmed. Evidence of parent-of-origin and seasonal effects on disease susceptibility add further complexity to the genetics of MS. The search for MS susceptibility genes continues using the candidate-gene approach as well as large-scale single-nucleotide-polymorphism association studies and novel cross-species synteny analysis. Genome-wide expression profiling using microarrays produced numerous therapeutic targets and is progressing towards profiling of rare cells. Advances in classical proteomics methods paved the way to new initiatives aiming at determining the proteome of the nervous system in normal and diseased states. Although progress is still slow, array-based methods are making an impact on the MS field. SUMMARY: The complexity of MS is clearly reflected in the latest findings using global profiling methods. Nevertheless, these new technologies are confirming some of the basic aspects of the disease pathophysiology, i.e. its polygenicity, the central role of neuroinflammation and the emerging neurodegenerative processes. These data are primarily the results of genomic approaches, yet promising attempts are also made using proteomics and metabolomics.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic inflammatory neurological disease. Despite major advances the aetiology of this disease it is still not completely understood. In the post-genome era, advances in global screening technologies offer an opportunity to accelerate the search of new pathological pathways and to identify new therapeutic targets. Some recent publications using novel global screening methods at the genome, transcriptome, proteome and metabolome levels are discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: The genetic association of susceptibility to MS with loci outside the MHC has been reconfirmed. Evidence of parent-of-origin and seasonal effects on disease susceptibility add further complexity to the genetics of MS. The search for MS susceptibility genes continues using the candidate-gene approach as well as large-scale single-nucleotide-polymorphism association studies and novel cross-species synteny analysis. Genome-wide expression profiling using microarrays produced numerous therapeutic targets and is progressing towards profiling of rare cells. Advances in classical proteomics methods paved the way to new initiatives aiming at determining the proteome of the nervous system in normal and diseased states. Although progress is still slow, array-based methods are making an impact on the MS field. SUMMARY: The complexity of MS is clearly reflected in the latest findings using global profiling methods. Nevertheless, these new technologies are confirming some of the basic aspects of the disease pathophysiology, i.e. its polygenicity, the central role of neuroinflammation and the emerging neurodegenerative processes. These data are primarily the results of genomic approaches, yet promising attempts are also made using proteomics and metabolomics.
Authors: Lionel Blanchet; Agnieszka Smolinska; Amos Attali; Marcel P Stoop; Kirsten A M Ampt; Hans van Aken; Ernst Suidgeest; Tinka Tuinstra; Sybren S Wijmenga; Theo Luider; Lutgarde M C Buydens Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2011-06-22 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Pablo Villoslada; Cristina Alonso; Ion Agirrezabal; Ekaterina Kotelnikova; Irati Zubizarreta; Irene Pulido-Valdeolivas; Albert Saiz; Manuel Comabella; Xavier Montalban; Luisa Villar; Jose Carlos Alvarez-Cermeño; Oscar Fernández; Roberto Alvarez-Lafuente; Rafael Arroyo; Azucena Castro Journal: Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Date: 2017-01-27
Authors: Shanshan Zhou; Fabio Morgante; Matthew S Geisz; Junwu Ma; Robert R H Anholt; Trudy F C Mackay Journal: Genome Res Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Ralf A Linker; Peter Brechlin; Sarah Jesse; Petra Steinacker; D H Lee; Abdul R Asif; Olaf Jahn; Hayrettin Tumani; Ralf Gold; Markus Otto Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Andre M Mueller; Xiomara Pedré; Thomas Stempfl; Ingo Kleiter; Sebastien Couillard-Despres; Ludwig Aigner; Gerhard Giegerich; Andreas Steinbrecher Journal: J Neuroinflammation Date: 2008-05-26 Impact factor: 8.322