BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively differences in MR signal intensity and contrast enhancement between intra- and extracranial components of jugular foramen meningioma (JFM). METHODS: MR studies of eight patients who underwent surgery for histologically confirmed JFM were reviewed retrospectively. Signal intensity differences between intra- and extracranial components of all eight JFMs on axial T1-, T2-, and postcontrast T1-weighted images were evaluated visually. In six of the eight JFMs, quantitative signal intensity evaluations were also performed by using relative signal intensity ratios of the intra- and extracranial components of JFM to CNS tissue at the same level. Paired t tests were used to evaluate differences in relative signal intensity ratios in each JFM between intra- and extracranial components. RESULTS: Both visual and quantitative signal intensity evaluations revealed that signal intensities of the intracranial component of JFM were significantly higher than those of the extracranial component on T1-, T2-, and postcontrast T1-weighted images. Results of relative signal intensity ratios were 0.89 +/- 0.04 versus 0.77 +/- 0.02 on T1-weighted images (P = .002); 1.66 +/- 0.28 versus 0.88 +/- 0.14 on T2-weighted images (P = .003); and 2.16 +/- 0.29 versus 1.77 +/- 0.26 on postcontrast T1-weighted images (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Intra- and extracranial components of JFM display different signal intensity and enhancement patterns. These differences may be related to histologic composition, and in particular, collagen content.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively differences in MR signal intensity and contrast enhancement between intra- and extracranial components of jugular foramen meningioma (JFM). METHODS: MR studies of eight patients who underwent surgery for histologically confirmed JFM were reviewed retrospectively. Signal intensity differences between intra- and extracranial components of all eight JFMs on axial T1-, T2-, and postcontrast T1-weighted images were evaluated visually. In six of the eight JFMs, quantitative signal intensity evaluations were also performed by using relative signal intensity ratios of the intra- and extracranial components of JFM to CNS tissue at the same level. Paired t tests were used to evaluate differences in relative signal intensity ratios in each JFM between intra- and extracranial components. RESULTS: Both visual and quantitative signal intensity evaluations revealed that signal intensities of the intracranial component of JFM were significantly higher than those of the extracranial component on T1-, T2-, and postcontrast T1-weighted images. Results of relative signal intensity ratios were 0.89 +/- 0.04 versus 0.77 +/- 0.02 on T1-weighted images (P = .002); 1.66 +/- 0.28 versus 0.88 +/- 0.14 on T2-weighted images (P = .003); and 2.16 +/- 0.29 versus 1.77 +/- 0.26 on postcontrast T1-weighted images (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Intra- and extracranial components of JFM display different signal intensity and enhancement patterns. These differences may be related to histologic composition, and in particular, collagen content.
Authors: André J Macdonald; Karen L Salzman; H Ric Harnsberger; Erik Gilbert; Clough Shelton Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.959