Literature DB >> 15890820

Water intake and wastage at nipple drinkers by growing-finishing pigs.

Y Z Li1, L Chénard, S P Lemay, H W Gonyou.   

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to assess water intake, water wastage, and a means to decrease water wastage by growing-finishing pigs from nipple drinkers. In Exp. 1, 48 pigs were studied during two periods (average BW = 53 and 72 kg for Period 1 and 2, respectively). Water disappearance and wastage were determined for 4 d, while nipple drinkers were set at 50 mm above the shoulder height of the smallest pig in the pen (recommended heights), with flow rates at 700 mL/min during Period 1, and 1,000 mL/min during Period 2. Water intake rate was assessed at two nipple flow rates, approximately 650 and 1,300 mL/min during the Period 1, and 1,000 and 2,000 mL/min during the Period 2. The average water intake was 4.01 and 5.38 +/- 0.19 L.pig(-1).d(-1) during Periods 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.01). Water wastage as a percentage of water disappearance was similar between the two periods (25.8 and 27.0 +/- 1.9% for Periods 1 and 2, respectively). Water intake rate was 467 and 795 mL/min (+/-34.2; P < 0.01) during Period 1, and 722 and 1,422 mL/min (+/-80.0; P < 0.01) during Period 2, at the lower and higher flow rates, respectively. In Exp. 2, 32 pigs were used in a 2 x 2 factorial design to determine effects of nipple heights (recommended vs. unadjusted = 330 mm) and flow rates (500 vs. 1,000 mL/min) on water intake and wastage. Water wastage was increased (P < 0.01) on the unadjusted vs. recommended nipple height, and the higher flow rate also resulted in greater wastage (P = 0.03) compared with the lower rate. In Exp. 3, water disappearance and manure output in 16 pens of 18 pigs per pen were monitored for 12 wk (average initial BW = 32 kg) using four drinker treatments (bowl drinker, nipple drinker at recommended heights, an unadjusted nipple set at 480 mm, and high nipple drinker height of 730 mm with a step underneath). For pigs on the high nipple drinker, the average water disappearance and manure output did not differ from those of the pigs on the recommended nipple heights and bowl drinker, but these measurements were 15 and 12% lower, respectively, than for the pigs on the low nipple drinker. The results indicate that growing-finishing pigs can maintain adequate water intake from a variety of drinker types and management. Water wastage can be controlled through drinker management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15890820     DOI: 10.2527/2005.8361413x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  8 in total

1.  The preference for water nipples vs. water bowls in dairy goats.

Authors:  Knut E Bøe; Rebecca Ehrlenbruch; Inger L Andersen
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.695

2.  Implementing drinking water feed additive strategies in post-weaning piglets, antibiotic reduction and performance impacts: case study.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Mesonero Escuredo; Yvonne van der Horst; John Carr; Dominiek Maes
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2016-10-16

3.  In-Water Antibiotic Dosing Practices on Pig Farms.

Authors:  Stephen Little; Andrew Woodward; Glenn Browning; Helen Billman-Jacobe
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-08

4.  Effect of drinker type on water disappearance of nursery pigs.

Authors:  Katherine D Vande Pol; Nicholas S Grohmann; Thomas E Weber; Matthew J Ritter; Michael Ellis
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-01-29

5.  Effects of water quality on growth performance and health of nursery pigs.

Authors:  Brigit M Lozinski; Brent Frederick; Yuzhi Li; Milena Saqui-Salces; Gerald C Shurson; Pedro E Urriola; Melissa L Wilson; Lee J Johnston
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-01-15

6.  Influence of high cyclic ambient temperature and water drinker design on growth performance and water disappearance of growing-finishing pigs.

Authors:  Katherine D Vande Pol; Nicholas S Grohmann; Thomas E Weber; Matthew J Ritter; Michael Ellis
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-08-24

7.  Impact of water flow rate on finishing pig performance.

Authors:  Hannah E Miller; Katlyn McClellan; Jorge Y Perez-Palencia; Ryan S Samuel; Crystal L Levesque; Robert C Thaler
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-09-01

8.  Effects of cooled floor pads combined with chilled drinking water on behavior and performance of lactating sows under heat stress.

Authors:  Y Zhu; L J Johnston; M H Reese; E S Buchanan; J E Tallaksen; A H Hilbrands; Y Z Li
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.