Literature DB >> 15890808

Effect of diets containing linoleic acid- or oleic acid-rich oils on ruminal fermentation and nutrient digestibility, and performance and fatty acid composition of adipose and muscle tissues of finishing cattle.

A N Hristov1, L R Kennington, M A McGuire, C W Hunt.   

Abstract

Two trials were conducted to determine the effect of linoleic acid- or oleic acid-rich safflower oil on ruminal fermentation, nutrient digestion, feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, and fatty acid composition of adipose and muscle tissues of beef cattle. In both trials, cattle were fed a finishing diet based on barley grain, wheat silage, and alfalfa hay. Oils were fed at 5% of dietary DM. In a metabolism trial, four ruminally and duodenally cannulated Angus crossbred steers were subjected to linoleic acid-rich oil or oleic acid-rich oil in a crossover design with covariate periods (no oil supplementation). In a finishing trial, 16 individually fed Angus crossbred steers and heifers (eight per diet) received linoleic acid- or oleic acid-rich oils during the last 86 d of a 116-d feeding period. Ruminal pH, ammonia concentration, protozoal counts, major VFA concentrations, acetate-to-propionate ratio, polysaccharide-degrading activities, microbial N flow to the duodenum, and the efficiency of microbial N synthesis in the rumen were not affected (P = 0.18 to 0.96) by type of oil. Type of oil had no effect on total-tract apparent digestion of nutrients (P = 0.46 to 0.98). Ruminal true nutrient digestibilities did not differ between oils (P = 0.15 to 0.99), except that the linoleic acid-rich oil decreased (P = 0.05) NDF digestibility. Dry matter intake, ADG, G:F, and carcass characteristics did not differ (P = 0.11 to 0.84) between the two oils. Overall, the difference in dietary fatty acids provided to the cattle produced few changes in tissue fatty acids. Weight percentages of c9t11 CLA were unaltered by the addition of linoleic acid to the diet compared with oleic acid, probably as a result of low vaccenic acid production in the rumen, as the pathway of biohydrogenation was apparently primarily through the t10 pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15890808     DOI: 10.2527/2005.8361312x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  6 in total

1.  The trans-10,cis-15 18:2: a missing intermediate of trans-10 shifted rumen biohydrogenation pathway?

Authors:  Susana P Alves; Rui J B Bessa
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 1.880

Review 2.  Significance of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) as a feed resource towards small-ruminant animal production in Southern Africa: a review.

Authors:  J Kabinda; J Madzimure; C Murungweni; I D T Mpofu
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Effects of season and reproductive state on lipid intake and fatty acid composition of gastrointestinal tract contents in the European hare.

Authors:  F D Popescu; K Hackländer; W Arnold; T Ruf
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Fatty Acid Profiles and Stearoyl-CoA Desaturase Gene Expression in Longissimus dorsi Muscle of Growing Lambs Influenced by Addition of Tea Saponins and Soybean Oil.

Authors:  H L Mao; J K Wang; J Lin; J X Liu
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 2.509

5.  Improving beef hamburger quality and fatty acid profiles through dietary manipulation and exploitation of fat depot heterogeneity.

Authors:  Cletos Mapiye; Jennifer L Aalhus; Payam Vahmani; David C Rolland; Timothy A McAllister; Hushton C Block; Bethany Uttaro; Spencer D Proctor; Michael E R Dugan
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11-24

6.  Comparing subcutaneous adipose tissue in beef and muskox with emphasis on trans 18:1 and conjugated linoleic acids.

Authors:  Michael E R Dugan; John K G Kramer; Wayne M Robertson; William J Meadus; Noelia Aldai; David C Rolland
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 1.646

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.