Literature DB >> 15890748

PROFcon: novel prediction of long-range contacts.

Marco Punta1, Burkhard Rost.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Despite the continuing advance in the experimental determination of protein structures, the gap between the number of known protein sequences and structures continues to increase. Prediction methods can bridge this sequence-structure gap only partially. Better predictions of non-local contacts between residues could improve comparative modeling, fold recognition and could assist in the experimental structure determination.
RESULTS: Here, we introduced PROFcon, a novel contact prediction method that combines information from alignments, from predictions of secondary structure and solvent accessibility, from the region between two residues and from the average properties of the entire protein. In contrast to some other methods, PROFcon predicted short and long proteins at similar levels of accuracy. As expected, PROFcon was clearly less accurate when tested on sparse evolutionary profiles, that is, on families with few homologs. Prediction accuracy was highest for proteins belonging to the SCOP alpha/beta class. PROFcon compared favorably with state-of-the-art prediction methods at the CASP6 meeting. While the performance may still be perceived as low, our method clearly pushed the mark higher. Furthermore, predictions are already accurate enough to seed predictions of global features of protein structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15890748     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  46 in total

1.  Prediction of inter-residue contact clusters from hydrophobic cores.

Authors:  Peng Chen; Chunmei Liu; Legand Burge; Mohammad Mahmood; William Southerland; Clay Gloster
Journal:  Int J Data Min Bioinform       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 0.667

2.  A comprehensive assessment of sequence-based and template-based methods for protein contact prediction.

Authors:  Sitao Wu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  ModLink+: improving fold recognition by using protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Oriol Fornes; Ramon Aragues; Jordi Espadaler; Marc A Marti-Renom; Andrej Sali; Baldo Oliva
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Benchmarking of TASSER_2.0: an improved protein structure prediction algorithm with more accurate predicted contact restraints.

Authors:  Seung Yup Lee; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Fast and accurate methods for predicting short-range constraints in protein models.

Authors:  Dominik Gront; Andrzej Kolinski
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  BCL::contact-low confidence fold recognition hits boost protein contact prediction and de novo structure determination.

Authors:  Mert Karakaş; Nils Woetzel; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.479

7.  NNcon: improved protein contact map prediction using 2D-recursive neural networks.

Authors:  Allison N Tegge; Zheng Wang; Jesse Eickholt; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Prediction of protein long-range contacts using an ensemble of genetic algorithm classifiers with sequence profile centers.

Authors:  Peng Chen; Jinyan Li
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2010-05-17

9.  Characterization of non-trivial neighborhood fold constraints from protein sequences using generalized topohydrophobicity.

Authors:  Guillaume Fourty; Isabelle Callebaut; Jean-Paul Mornon
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2008-01-31

10.  A modular kernel approach for integrative analysis of protein domain boundaries.

Authors:  Paul D Yoo; Bing Bing Zhou; Albert Y Zomaya
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.