Literature DB >> 15890731

Comparison of GnRH agonists and antagonists in assisted reproduction cycles of patients at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

G Ragni1, W Vegetti, A Riccaboni, B Engl, C Brigante, P G Crosignani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During IVF or ICSI cycles, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a major problem. The aim of this prospective, multicentre, comparative study (using historical controls) was to assess the efficacy of a GnRH antagonist protocol in preventing OHSS in selected patients who had experienced OHSS or had been at risk of OHSS in their previous IVF/ICSI attempt. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients underwent a new cycle where the same gonadotrophin protocol was used [same dose of recombinant FSH (rFSH)] but a different protocol was used for pituitary desensitization: cetrorelix 0.25 mg multiple-dose antagonist instead of GnRH agonist long protocol. Cetrorelix 0.25 mg was administered daily, starting when the leading follicle reached a diameter of 14 mm. In other words, rFSH was administered in the new cycle according to the dosage and the step-up or step-down modalities used during the previous cycle, independently of ultrasound findings and serum estradiol (E(2)) levels. Eighty-seven patients entered the study. Out of the 87 cycles involving GnRH agonists, 49 (56.3%) were cancelled and out of the 87 involving GnRH antagonists 28 (32.2%) were cancelled [McNemar's test; 95% confidence interval (CI) -35.8% to -11.2%; P < 0.001]. After GnRH agonist cycles, we recorded 24 cases of OHSS (18 moderate and six severe; 27.6%), whereas after the GnRH antagonist cycles there were 10 cases of OHSS (nine moderate and one severe; 11.5%) (95% CI-26.4% to -5.7%; P = 0.006). There was a statistically significant reduction in the total number of follicles with a diameter >10 mm (Wilcoxon's test; Z = 6.1; P < 0.001) and of E(2) levels on the day of HCG administration (2538 versus 4322.4 pg/ml; P < 0.001) in the GnRH antagonist cycles versus GnRH agonist cycles. Twenty-nine patients had an embryo transfer in the first cycle (76.3% of oocyte retrievals) and 57 in the cycle using GnRH antagonist (96.6%). This 20.3% difference was also significant (Z-test; 95% CI 6.8-36.0%; P = 0.003). After the antagonist cycles, 18 pregnancies (20.7 per initiated cycle; 31.6% per embryo transfer) were obtained.
CONCLUSIONS: Although this study presents some limitations owing to the use of historical controls, our data show a favourable effect of GnRH antagonists in reducing the incidence of OHSS and the number of assisted fertilization cycles cancelled because of the risk of OHSS in high responder patients. As a consequence, GnRH antagonist plus gonadotrophin administration could also increase the percentage of oocyte retrievals and embryo transfers in this high risk group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15890731     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  11 in total

1.  Mild/minimal stimulation protocol for ovarian stimulation of patients at high risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Authors:  L Rinaldi; F Lisi; H Selman
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  A prospective study of GnRH long agonist versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS: Indian experience.

Authors:  Harpreet Kaur; Deepika Krishna; Nivedita Shetty; Sandhya Krishnan; Ms Srinivas; Kamini Arvind Rao
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-05

3.  Balancing selected medication costs with total number of daily injections: a preference analysis of GnRH-agonist and antagonist protocols by IVF patients.

Authors:  E Scott Sills; Gary S Collins; Shala A Salem; Christopher A Jones; Alison C Peck; Rifaat D Salem
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  GnRH antagonist versus agonist in normoresponders undergoing ICSI: a randomized clinical trial in Iran.

Authors:  Ensieh Tehraninejad; Akram Ghahghaei Nezamabadi; Batool Rashidi; Maryam Sohrabi; Maryam Bagheri; Fedyeh Haghollahi; Elham Azimi Nekoo; Mina Jafarabadi
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2011

5.  Comparison of GnRH agonist, GnRH antagonist, and GnRH antagonist mild protocol of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in good prognosis patients.

Authors:  Martin Stimpfel; Eda Vrtacnik-Bokal; Barbara Pozlep; Irma Virant-Klun
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.257

6.  Treatment of primary infertility in McCune-Albright syndrome: a case report of a successful in vitro fertilization cycle.

Authors:  Rebecca K Chung; Abigail C Mancuso; Jessica D Kresowik
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2021-05-20

7.  Is a GnRH antagonist protocol better in PCOS patients? A meta-analysis of RCTs.

Authors:  Haiyan Lin; Yu Li; Lin Li; Wenjun Wang; Dongzi Yang; Qingxue Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  GnRH Antagonist IVF Protocol in PCOS.

Authors:  Alina Onofriescu; A Bors; A Luca; M Holicov; M Onofriescu; Carmen Vulpoi
Journal:  Curr Health Sci J       Date:  2013-03-21

9.  Comparison of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist with GnRH antagonist in polycystic ovary syndrome patients undergoing in vitro fertilization cycle: Retrospective analysis from a tertiary center and review of literature.

Authors:  Neeta Singh; Moumita Naha; Neena Malhotra; Kusum Lata; P Vanamail; Abnish Tiwari
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-01

10.  A high response to controlled ovarian stimulation induces premature luteinization with a negative impact on pregnancy outcomes in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycle.

Authors:  Hwa Seon Koo; Sun Hwa Cha; Hye Ok Kim; In Ok Song; Eung Gi Min; Kwang Moon Yang; Chan Woo Park
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2015-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.