Literature DB >> 15890571

Evaluating changes in tumor volume using magnetic resonance imaging during the course of radiotherapy treatment of high-grade gliomas: Implications for conformal dose-escalation studies.

Christina Tsien1, Diana Gomez-Hassan, Randall K Ten Haken, Daniel Tatro, L Junck, T L Chenevert, T Lawrence.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether changes in tumor volume occur during the course of conformal 3D radiotherapy of high-grade gliomas by use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during treatment and whether these changes had an impact on tumor coverage. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between December 2000 and January 2004, 21 patients with WHO Grades 3 to 4 supratentorial malignant gliomas treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy (median dose, 70 Gy) were enrolled in a prospective clinical study. All patients underwent T1-weighted contrast-enhancing and T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging at approximately 1 to 2 weeks before radiotherapy, during radiotherapy (Weeks 1 and 3), and at routine intervals thereafter. All MRI scans were coregistered to the treatment-planning CT. Gross tumor volume (GTV Pre-Rx) was defined from a postoperative T1-weighted contrast-enhancing MRI performed 1 to 2 weeks before start of radiotherapy. A second GTV (GTV Week 3) was defined by use of an MRI performed during Week 3 of radiotherapy. A uniform 0.5 cm expansion of the respective GTV, PTV (Pre-Rx), and PTV (Week 3) was applied to the final boost plan. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) were used to analyze any potential adverse changes in tumor coverage based on Week 3 MRI.
RESULTS: All MRI scans were reviewed independently by a neuroradiologist (DGH). Two patients were noted to have multifocal disease at presentation and were excluded from analysis. In 19 cases, changes in the GTV based on MRI at Week 3 during radiotherapy were as follows: 2 cases had an objective decrease in GTV (> or =50%); 12 cases revealed a slight decrease in the rim enhancement or changes in cystic appearance of the GTV; 2 cases showed no change in GTV; and 3 cases demonstrated an increase in tumor volume. Both cases with objective decreases in GTV during treatment were Grade 3 tumors. No cases of tumor progression were noted in Grade 3 tumors during treatment. In comparison, three of 12 Grade 4 tumors had tumor progression, based on MRI obtained during Week 3 of radiotherapy. Median increase in GTV (Week 3) was 11.7 cc (range, 9.8-21.3). Retrospective DVH analysis of PTV (Pre-Rx) and PTV (Week 3) demonstrated a decrease in V(95%)(PTV volume receiving 95% of the prescribed dose) in those 3 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine MR imaging during radiotherapy may be essential in ensuring tumor coverage if highly conformal radiotherapy techniques such as stereotactic boost and intensity-modulated radiotherapy are used in dose-escalation trials that utilize smaller treatment margins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15890571     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  15 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of imaging biomarkers. Part 3. The neuro-oncologist's perspective.

Authors:  A Shenoy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Clinical target volume delineation in glioblastomas: pre-operative versus post-operative/pre-radiotherapy MRI.

Authors:  P Farace; M G Giri; G Meliadò; D Amelio; L Widesott; G K Ricciardi; S Dall'Oglio; A Rizzotti; A Sbarbati; A Beltramello; S Maluta; M Amichetti
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Evaluation of an automatic registration-based algorithm for direct measurement of volume change in tumors.

Authors:  Saradwata Sarkar; Timothy D Johnson; Bing Ma; Thomas L Chenevert; Peyton H Bland; Hyunjin Park; Anne F Schott; Brian D Ross; Charles R Meyer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Application of Benchtop-magnetic resonance imaging in a nude mouse tumor model.

Authors:  Henrike Caysa; Hendrik Metz; Karsten Mäder; Thomas Mueller
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-07-21

5.  Daily Tracking of Glioblastoma Resection Cavity, Cerebral Edema, and Tumor Volume with MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Shahil Mehta; Shefali R Gajjar; Kyle R Padgett; David Asher; Radka Stoyanova; John C Ford; Eric A Mellon
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-03-19

6.  The Predictive Value of Tumor Volume and Its Change on Short-Term Outcome for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Shuai Liang; Chengming Li; Zhenhua Gao; Dongping Shang; Jinming Yu; Xue Meng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Study on the Appropriate Timing of Postoperative Adaptive Radiotherapy for High-Grade Glioma.

Authors:  Ying Cao; Du Tang; Yining Xiang; Li Men; Chao Liu; Qin Zhou; Jun Wu; Lei Huo; Tao Song; Ying Wang; Zhanzhan Li; Rui Wei; Liangfang Shen; Zhen Yang; Jidong Hong
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  Evaluating changes in radiation treatment volumes from post-operative to same-day planning MRI in High-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Colin E Champ; Joshua Siglin; Mark V Mishra; Xinglei Shen; Maria Werner-Wasik; David W Andrews; Sonal U Mayekar; Haisong Liu; Wenyin Shi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for gliomas:dosimetric effects of changes in gross tumor volume on organs at risk and healthy brain tissue.

Authors:  Zhen Yang; Zijian Zhang; Xia Wang; Yongmei Hu; Zhiping Lyu; Lei Huo; Rui Wei; Jun Fu; Jidong Hong
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Improved dosimetric accuracy with semi-automatic contour propagation of organs-at-risk in glioblastoma patients undergoing chemoradiation.

Authors:  Sangjune Lee; James Stewart; Young Lee; Sten Myrehaug; Arjun Sahgal; Mark Ruschin; Chia-Lin Tseng
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.