Literature DB >> 15890429

Comparison of the quality of diabetes care in primary care diabetic clinics and general practice clinics.

K A J Al Khaja1, R P Sequeira, A H H Damanhori.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the quality of care provided to diabetic hypertensive patients by diabetic clinics versus general practice clinics (GP-clinics) in a primary care setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of medical records of patients from six primary care centres in Bahrain.
RESULTS: The recommended target blood pressure <130/85 mmHg was achieved in 6.8 and 10%, and glycated haemoglobin <7% was attained in 14.8 and 11% of patients attending diabetic clinics (n=177) and GP-clinics (n=180), respectively. Although complementary antihypertensive combinations were prescribed at a rate less than that recommended in guidelines, combinations were significantly more often prescribed for patients attending the GP-clinics (46.7% [95% CI 39.4-53.9] versus 33.4% [CI 26.8-40.6]; p=0.01). The prescribing pattern and rank-order of antihypertensive and oral hypoglycaemic agents prescribed, either as monotherapy or in combinations, were similar in both clinics. The majority of diabetic hypertensive patients attending diabetic clinics or GP-clinics were at high cardiovascular risk. Anthropometric characteristics were recorded consistently in patients attending diabetic clinics. Laboratory investigations were extensively utilized for monitoring patients attending diabetic clinics.
CONCLUSIONS: In primary care, in both diabetic clinics and GP-clinics, hypertension and diabetes were inadequately controlled, with no difference between the two settings. An integrated approach involving diabetic clinics managed by primary care physicians and nurses trained in diabetes management, and supported by national guidelines, is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15890429     DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2005.03.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract        ISSN: 0168-8227            Impact factor:   5.602


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of Health Outcomes by Care Provider Type for Newly Diagnosed Mild Type 2 Diabetes Patients in South Korea: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hee-Chung Kang; Jae-Seok Hong
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-09

Review 2.  Glycemic Control among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Countries of Arabic Gulf.

Authors:  Ahmad Ali Al-Rasheedi
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2015-07

Review 3.  Quality of type 2 diabetes management in the states of the Co-operation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf: a systematic review.

Authors:  Layla Alhyas; Ailsa McKay; Anjali Balasanthiran; Azeem Majeed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  What are patient factors associated with the quality of diabetes care?: results from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Ki Dong Ko; Bo Hyun Kim; Sang Min Park; Soo In Oh; Chun Sik Um; Dong Wook Shin; Hae Won Lee
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Job strain and supervisor support in primary care health centres and glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Anne Koponen; Jussi Vahtera; Janne Pitkäniemi; Marianna Virtanen; Jaana Pentti; Nina Simonsen-Rehn; Mika Kivimäki; Sakari Suominen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.