Literature DB >> 15889454

Does it always help to adjust for misclassification of a binary outcome in logistic regression?

Xianqun Luan1, Wei Pan, Susan G Gerberich, Bradley P Carlin.   

Abstract

It is well known that in logistic regression, where the outcome is measured with error, a biased estimate of the association between the outcome and a risk factor may result if no proper adjustment is made. Hence, it seems tempting to always adjust for possible misclassification of the outcome. Here we show that it is not always beneficial to do so because, though the adjustment reduces the bias, it also inflates the variance, leading to a possibly larger mean squared error of the estimate. In the context of a data set on agricultural injuries, numerical evidence is provided through simulation studies. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15889454     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  9 in total

1.  Low-dose nonlinear effects of smoking on coronary heart disease risk.

Authors:  Louis Anthony Tony Cox
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Effects of disease misclassification on exposure-disease association.

Authors:  Qixuan Chen; Hanga Galfalvy; Naihua Duan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  An augmented estimation procedure for EHR-based association studies accounting for differential misclassification.

Authors:  Jiayi Tong; Jing Huang; Jessica Chubak; Xuan Wang; Jason H Moore; Rebecca A Hubbard; Yong Chen
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  The emerging landscape of health research based on biobanks linked to electronic health records: Existing resources, statistical challenges, and potential opportunities.

Authors:  Lauren J Beesley; Maxwell Salvatore; Lars G Fritsche; Anita Pandit; Arvind Rao; Chad Brummett; Cristen J Willer; Lynda D Lisabeth; Bhramar Mukherjee
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Phenotype validation in electronic health records based genetic association studies.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Scott M Damrauer; Hong Zhang; Alan X Zhang; Rui Xiao; Jason H Moore; Jinbo Chen
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Validation study methods for estimating odds ratio in 2 × 2 × J tables when exposure is misclassified.

Authors:  Bijan Nouri; Najaf Zare; Seyyed Mohammad Taghi Ayatollahi
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  Abortion Reporting in the United States: An Assessment of Three National Fertility Surveys.

Authors:  Laura Lindberg; Kathryn Kost; Isaac Maddow-Zimet; Sheila Desai; Mia Zolna
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2020-06

8.  PIE: A prior knowledge guided integrated likelihood estimation method for bias reduction in association studies using electronic health records data.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Rui Duan; Rebecca A Hubbard; Yonghui Wu; Jason H Moore; Hua Xu; Yong Chen
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Identifying the source of food-borne disease outbreaks: An application of Bayesian variable selection.

Authors:  Rianne Jacobs; Emmanuel Lesaffre; Peter Fm Teunis; Michael Höhle; Jan van de Kassteele
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.021

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.