Literature DB >> 15888822

Effect of a centralized clinical pharmacy anticoagulation service on the outcomes of anticoagulation therapy.

Daniel M Witt1, Melanie A Sadler, Roberta L Shanahan, Georgann Mazzoli, Donald J Tillman.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: A growing body of reports has documented the ability of anticoagulation management services to help patients receiving warfarin therapy achieve better outcomes compared to the care provided by their personal physicians (ie, usual care).
OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes associated with anticoagulation therapy provided by a clinical pharmacy anticoagulation service (CPAS) to usual care.
DESIGN: Retrospective, observational cohort study, 6 months in duration.
SETTING: Large nonprofit, group-model health maintenance organization. PATIENTS: A total of 6,645 patients receiving warfarin therapy were included in the final analyses (intervention group, 3,323 patients; control group, 3,322 patients). INTERVENTION: Anticoagulation therapy for patients in the intervention group was managed by a centralized, telephonic CPAS. Therapy for patients in the control group was managed in the usual manner by their personal physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the occurrence of anticoagulation therapy-related complications. A secondary outcome was the proportion of time spent in the target international normalized ratio (INR) range for each patient. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to examine the risk of complications in relation to the study group.
RESULTS: Patients in the CPAS were 39% less likely to experience an anticoagulation therapy-related complication than were patients in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.42 to 0.88). The number of patients needed to treat to prevent an anticoagulation therapy complication was 52. Additional analyses revealed that improved outcomes associated with CPAS were mediated largely through improved therapeutic INR control. Patients in the CPAS group spent 63.5% of study period days within their target INR range compared to 55.2% in the control group (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: A centralized, telephonic, pharmacist-managed anticoagulation monitoring service reduced the risk of anticoagulation therapy-related complications compared to that with usual care. The cumulative evidence supporting the superior care associated with implementing a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation monitoring service was sufficient to recommend widespread implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15888822     DOI: 10.1378/chest.127.5.1515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  72 in total

1.  Bridging for an isolated subtherapeutic INR: an evaluation of clinical practice patterns, outcomes, and costs from an anticoagulation clinic.

Authors:  Jamie M Hwang; Thomas N Taylor; Krishna P Sharma; Jennifer L Clemente; Candice L Garwood
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Should all pharmacists responsible for pharmacotherapeutic management of patients with complex or special drug therapy needs have certification from the board of pharmacy specialties?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2012-05

Review 3.  Role of the anticoagulant monitoring service in 2018: beyond warfarin.

Authors:  Nathan P Clark
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

4.  Development and implementation of a pharmacist-managed inpatient warfarin protocol.

Authors:  David L Damaske; Robert W Baird
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2005-10

5.  Descriptive analysis of the process and quality of oral anticoagulation management in real-life practice in patients with chronic non-valvular atrial fibrillation: the international study of anticoagulation management (ISAM).

Authors:  Jack Ansell; Jennifer Hollowell; Vittorio Pengo; Fernando Martinez-Brotons; Jaime Caro; Ludovic Drouet
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Anticoagulation for stroke prevention: high effectiveness, more cost benefit?

Authors:  Eduard Shantsila; Timothy Watson; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Anne Holbrook; Sam Schulman; Daniel M Witt; Per Olav Vandvik; Jason Fish; Michael J Kovacs; Peter J Svensson; David L Veenstra; Mark Crowther; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  A Bayesian dose-individualization method for warfarin.

Authors:  Daniel F B Wright; Stephen B Duffull
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Use of Telemedicine to Enhance Pharmacist Services in the Nursing Facility.

Authors:  Sandra L Kane-Gill; Joshua D Niznik; John A Kellum; Colleen M Culley; Richard D Boyce; Zachary A Marcum; Harvey He; Subashan Perera; Steven M Handler
Journal:  Consult Pharm       Date:  2017-02-01

10.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: optimal management of anticoagulation therapy.

Authors:  Daniel M Witt; Robby Nieuwlaat; Nathan P Clark; Jack Ansell; Anne Holbrook; Jane Skov; Nadine Shehab; Juliet Mock; Tarra Myers; Francesco Dentali; Mark A Crowther; Arnav Agarwal; Meha Bhatt; Rasha Khatib; John J Riva; Yuan Zhang; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.