Literature DB >> 15888412

Biosonar behaviour of free-ranging porpoises.

Tomonari Akamatsu1, Ding Wang, Kexiong Wang, Yasuhiko Naito.   

Abstract

Detecting objects in their paths is a fundamental perceptional function of moving organisms. Potential risks and rewards, such as prey, predators, conspecifics or non-biological obstacles, must be detected so that an animal can modify its behaviour accordingly. However, to date few studies have considered how animals in the wild focus their attention. Dolphins and porpoises are known to actively use sonar or echolocation. A newly developed miniature data logger attached to a porpoise allows for individual recording of acoustical search efforts and inspection distance based on echolocation. In this study, we analysed the biosonar behaviour of eight free-ranging finless porpoises (Neophocaena phocaenoides) and demonstrated that these animals inspect the area ahead of them before swimming silently into it. The porpoises inspected distances up to 77 m, whereas their swimming distance without using sonar was less than 20 m. The inspection distance was long enough to ensure a wide safety margin before facing real risks or rewards. Once a potential prey item was detected, porpoises adjusted their inspection distance from the remote target throughout their approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15888412      PMCID: PMC1599864          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.3024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  13 in total

1.  A datalogger to identify vocalizing dolphins.

Authors:  P L Tyack; C A Recchia
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Echolocation signals of the greater horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) in transfer flight and during landing.

Authors:  B Tian; H U Schnitzler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Echolocation range of captive and free-ranging baiji (Lipotes vexillifer), finless porpoise (Neophocaena phocaenoides), and bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus).

Authors:  T Akamatsu; D Wang; K Nakamura; K Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Selective habituation shapes acoustic predator recognition in harbour seals.

Authors:  Volker B Deecke; Peter J B Slater; John K B Ford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Onboard acoustic recording from diving northern elephant seals.

Authors:  S Fletcher; B J Le Boeuf; D P Costa; P L Tyack; S B Blackwell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A method for individual identification of echolocation signals in free-ranging finless porpoises carrying data loggers.

Authors:  T Akamatsu; D Wang; K Wang; Y Naito
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Acoustic monitoring on a humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) feeding ground shows continual singing into late Spring.

Authors:  Christopher W Clark; Phillip J Clapham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) ignore ships but respond to alerting stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas P Nowacek; Mark P Johnson; Peter L Tyack
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Linking the sounds of dolphins to their locations and behavior using video and multichannel acoustic recordings.

Authors:  Rebecca E Thomas; Kurt M Fristrup; Peter L Tyack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Sperm whale sound production studied with ultrasound time/depth-recording tags.

Authors:  P T Madsen; R Payne; N U Kristiansen; M Wahlberg; I Kerr; B Møhl
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  7 in total

1.  Echolocation behaviour adapted to prey in foraging Blainville's beaked whale (Mesoplodon densirostris).

Authors:  M Johnson; L S Hickmott; N Aguilar Soto; P T Madsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Echolocation in Blainville's beaked whales (Mesoplodon densirostris).

Authors:  P T Madsen; N Aguilar de Soto; P Arranz; M Johnson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Hearing sensation levels of emitted biosonar clicks in an echolocating Atlantic bottlenose dolphin.

Authors:  Songhai Li; Paul E Nachtigall; Marlee Breese; Alexander Ya Supin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Passive acoustic monitoring of the temporal variability of odontocete tonal sounds from a long-term marine observatory.

Authors:  Tzu-Hao Lin; Hsin-Yi Yu; Chi-Fang Chen; Lien-Siang Chou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Low-frequency sampling rates are effective to record bottlenose dolphins.

Authors:  Bianca Romeu; Alexandre M S Machado; Fábio G Daura-Jorge; Marta J Cremer; Ana Kássia de Moraes Alves; Paulo C Simões-Lopes
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Upside-down swimming behaviour of free-ranging narwhals.

Authors:  Rune Dietz; Ari D Shapiro; Mehdi Bakhtiari; Jack Orr; Peter L Tyack; Pierre Richard; Ida Grønborg Eskesen; Greg Marshall
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 2.964

7.  Passive Acoustic Monitoring the Diel, Lunar, Seasonal and Tidal Patterns in the Biosonar Activity of the Indo-Pacific Humpback Dolphins (Sousa chinensis) in the Pearl River Estuary, China.

Authors:  Zhi-Tao Wang; Paul E Nachtigall; Tomonari Akamatsu; Ke-Xiong Wang; Yu-Ping Wu; Jian-Chang Liu; Guo-Qin Duan; Han-Jiang Cao; Ding Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.