Literature DB >> 15887609

Physicians' liability in obstetric and gynecology practice.

Anna Mavroforou1, Evgenios Koumantakis, Emmanuel Michalodimitrakis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Litigation in obstetric and gynecologic practice has arisen as an important issue. This article aims to highlight issues related to malpractice in obstetrics and gynecology in order to point out several important aspects of medical practice, which may offer adequate professional protection. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Search of the current relevant literature.
RESULTS: The four most common clinical causes of medical litigation in obstetrics and gynecology are cases involving fetal distress, uterine rupture after a vaginal birth in a woman with a previous Cesarean section, shoulder dystocia, and misdiagnosis of breast cancer. Litigation raised in most of the cases is driven by bad outcomes and not by malpractice. Additionally, both juries and the public often expect perfection as the natural result of pregnancy and any deviation from this expectation has to be the result of someone's negligence. For this reason it has become mandatory for doctors in hospitals and private practices to acquire a sufficient knowledge relating to modem management, to document carefully in writing their procedural and management plans and to become familiar with the legal aspects of medical practice. Adequate communication and a written patient's consent form are of paramount importance.
CONCLUSION: Maintenance of high standards in daily practice with continuous training, clear communication and a signed Patient's Informed Consent Form along with the appropriate documentation of any procedure carried out may provide professional safety to practicing obstetricians and gynecologists in case of medical litigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15887609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Law        ISSN: 0723-1393


  6 in total

1.  Improved overall delivery documentation following implementation of a standardized shoulder dystocia delivery form.

Authors:  Vasiliki A Moragianni; Michele R Hacker; Frank J Craparo
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 1.901

2.  Shoulder dystocia: an Evidence-Based approach.

Authors:  Salvatore Politi; Laura Dʼemidio; Pietro Cignini; Maurizio Giorlandino; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2010-07

3.  Decision-making process for choosing an elective cesarean delivery among primiparas in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shiou-Yun Huang; Shuh-Jen Sheu; Chen-Jei Tai; Ching-Ping Chiang; Li-Yin Chien
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-07

4.  A comparison of obstetric maneuvers for the acute management of shoulder dystocia.

Authors:  Matthew K Hoffman; Jennifer L Bailit; D Ware Branch; Ronald T Burkman; Paul Van Veldhusien; Li Lu; Michelle A Kominiarek; Judith U Hibbard; Helain J Landy; Shoshana Haberman; Isabelle Wilkins; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Kimberly D Gregory; Christos G Hatjis; Mildred M Ramirez; Uma M Reddy; James Troendle; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Analysis of malpractice claims in mammography: a complex issue.

Authors:  A Fileni; N Magnavita; L Pescarini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Textbook typologies: Challenging the myth of the perfect obstetric pelvis.

Authors:  Caroline VanSickle; Kylea L Liese; Julienne N Rutherford
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.227

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.