Literature DB >> 15887530

Estimating the growth kinetics of experimental tumors from as few as two determinations of tumor size: implications for clinical oncology.

Roberto Chignola1, Roberto Israel Foroni.   

Abstract

Clinical information on tumor growth is often limited to a few determinations of the size of the tumor burden taken at variable time. As a consequence, fitting of growth equations to clinical data is hampered by the small number of available data. On the other hand, characterising the tumor growth kinetics in terms of clinically relevant parameters, such as the doubling time of the tumors, is increasingly required to optimize and personalise treatments. A computational method is presented which can estimate the growth kinetics of tumors from as few as two determinations of its size taken at two successive time points, provided the size at which tumor growth saturates is known. The method is studied by using experimental data obtained in vitro with multicell tumor spheroids and in vivo with tumors grown in mice, and its outputs are compared to those obtained by fitting of experimental data with the Gompertz growth equation. Under certain assumptions and limitations the method provides comparable estimates of the doubling time of tumors with respect to the classical nonlinear fitting approach. The method is then tested against simulated tumor growth trajectories spanning the range of tumor sizes observed in the clinics. The simulations show that a relative classification of tumors on the basis of their growth kinetics can be obtained even if the size at which tumor growth saturates is not known. This result opens the possibility to classify patients bearing fast or slow growing tumors and, hence, to adapt therapeutic regimens under a more rationale basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15887530     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2005.845219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  10 in total

1.  Estimating Tumor Growth Rates In Vivo.

Authors:  Anne Talkington; Rick Durrett
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.758

2.  Growth dynamics of untreated glioblastomas in vivo.

Authors:  Anne Line Stensjøen; Ole Solheim; Kjell Arne Kvistad; Asta K Håberg; Øyvind Salvesen; Erik Magnus Berntsen
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Mammary gland tumor promotion by chronic administration of IGF1 and the insulin analogue AspB10 in the p53R270H/⁺WAPCre mouse model.

Authors:  Bas ter Braak; Christine Siezen; Ewoud N Speksnijder; Esmee Koedoot; Harry van Steeg; Daniela C F Salvatori; Bob van de Water; Jan Willem van der Laan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 6.466

4.  The thyroid cancer policy model: A mathematical simulation model of papillary thyroid carcinoma in The U.S. population.

Authors:  Carrie Lubitz; Ayman Ali; Tiannan Zhan; Curtis Heberle; Craig White; Yasuhiro Ito; Akira Miyauchi; G Scott Gazelle; Chung Yin Kong; Chin Hur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The initial engraftment of tumor cells is critical for the future growth pattern: a mathematical study based on simulations and animal experiments.

Authors:  Bertin Hoffmann; Tobias Lange; Vera Labitzky; Kristoffer Riecken; Andreas Wree; Udo Schumacher; Gero Wedemann
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Mathematical Approach to Differentiate Spontaneous and Induced Evolution to Drug Resistance During Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  James M Greene; Jana L Gevertz; Eduardo D Sontag
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-04

7.  Radiological evaluation of ex novo high grade glioma: velocity of diametric expansion and acceleration time study.

Authors:  Roberto Altieri; Francesco Certo; Giuseppe La Rocca; Antonio Melcarne; Diego Garbossa; Alberto Bianchi; Salvatore Crimi; Alessandro Pluchino; Simone Peschillo; Giuseppe M V Barbagallo
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Liquid biopsies for early diagnosis of brain tumours: in silico mathematical biomarker modelling.

Authors:  Johanna A Blee; Xia Liu; Abigail J Harland; Kavi Fatania; Stuart Currie; Kathreena M Kurian; Sabine Hauert
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.293

9.  Modeling the Dynamics of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Progression for Transvaginal Ultrasound-Based Screening and Early Detection.

Authors:  Dana-Adriana Botesteanu; Jung-Min Lee; Doron Levy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cancer recurrence times from a branching process model.

Authors:  Stefano Avanzini; Tibor Antal
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.475

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.