Literature DB >> 15887223

Similar long-term results of breast-conservation treatment for Stage I and II invasive lobular carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: The University of Pennsylvania experience.

Roberto J Santiago1, Eleanor E R Harris, Li Qin, Wei-Ting Hwang, Lawrence J Solin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to determine the long-term results of breast-conservation treatment in women with early-stage, invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.
METHODS: Between 1977 and 1995, 1093 women with Stage I and II invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast and 55 women with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast underwent lumpectomy, axillary lymph node dissection, and radiation treatment. Overall, 49% of the women received adjuvant systemic therapy (chemotherapy and/or hormones).
RESULTS: The median age was 52 years for patients in the invasive ductal group and 54 years for patients in the invasive lobular group. The median follow-up was 8.7 years and 10.2 years for patients in the invasive ductal and invasive lobular groups, respectively. A comparison of patients who had invasive lobular carcinoma with patients who had invasive ductal carcinoma showed no difference in the 10-year actuarial rates of overall survival (85% vs. 79%, respectively; P = 0.73), cause-specific survival (93% vs. 84%, respectively; P = 0.85), or freedom from distant metastases (81% vs. 80%, respectively; P = 0.76). The 10-year rates of local failure were 18% for patients with invasive lobular carcinoma and 12% for patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (P = 0.24), and the 10-year rates of contralateral breast carcinoma development for the 2 groups were 12% and 8%, respectively (P = 0.40).
CONCLUSIONS: Breast-conservation treatment yielded similar long-term results for women with early-stage, invasive lobular carcinoma and women with the more prevalent invasive ductal carcinoma. Copyright 2005 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15887223     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  12 in total

Review 1.  Appropriate margin for lumpectomy excision of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrea V Barrio; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-07

2.  Breast-conserving therapy and modified radical mastectomy for primary breast carcinoma: a matched comparative study.

Authors:  Lize Wang; Tao Ouyang; Tianfeng Wang; Yuntao Xie; Zhaoqing Fan; Benyao Lin; Jinfeng Li
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  Was Reexcision Less Frequent for Patients with Lobular Breast Cancer After Publication of the SSO-ASTRO Margin Guidelines?

Authors:  Anita Mamtani; Emily C Zabor; Laura H Rosenberger; Michelle Stempel; Mary L Gemignani; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  A Comparison of the Clinicopathological Features, Metastasis Sites and Survival Outcomes of Invasive Lobular, Invasive Ductal and Mixed Invasive Ductal and Lobular Breast Carcinoma.

Authors:  Nüvit Duraker; Semih Hot; Arzu Akan; Pınar Özay Nayır
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2020-01-01

5.  Recurrent invasive lobular carcinoma presenting as a ruptured breast implant.

Authors:  Maikel Botros; Kenneth Chang; Robert Miller; Sunil Krishnan; Matthew Iott
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Comparison of Clinicopathological Features and Treatment Results between Invasive Lobular Carcinoma and Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast.

Authors:  Jun Su Park; Doo Ho Choi; Seung Jae Huh; Won Park; Young Il Kim; Seok Jin Nam; Jeong Eon Lee; Won Ho Kil
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.588

7.  Application of imaging mass spectrometry for the molecular diagnosis of human breast tumors.

Authors:  Xinxin Mao; Jiuming He; Tiegang Li; Zhaohui Lu; Jian Sun; Yunxiao Meng; Zeper Abliz; Jie Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast presenting as gastrointestinal obstruction: a mini review.

Authors:  P Carcoforo; M T Raiji; R C Langan; S Lanzara; M Portinari; U Maestroni; G M Palini; M V Zanzi; S Bonazza; M Pedriali; C V Feo; A Stojadinovic; I Avital
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Comparison of intraoperative frozen section analysis for sentinel lymph node biopsy during breast cancer surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  James W Horvath; Gary E Barnett; Rafael E Jimenez; Donn C Young; Stephen P Povoski
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 10.  MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature.

Authors:  Ritse M Mann; Yvonne L Hoogeveen; Johan G Blickman; Carla Boetes
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.