Literature DB >> 15886626

Use of Mimix hydroxyapatite bone cement for difficult ossicular reconstruction.

Joel A Goebel1, Abraham Jacob.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the advantages of using Mimix hydroxyapatite (HA) bone cement in reconstructing a variety of ossicular chain abnormalities. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Case series at a tertiary medical center.
RESULTS: Twenty-five cases of HA reconstruction are included in this series (ages 23-74; mean, 47 years). The examples presented include (1) HA as the sole reconstructive material for incus erosion, (2) HA for securing a total or partial ossicular replacement prosthesis, (3) incus augmentation after crimping for revision stapedotomy with incus erosion, (4) HA in primary stapedotomy to fix the crimped prosthesis to an intact incus, and (5) other unique situations. Preoperative and postoperative audiograms were evaluated for 4-tone pure tone average (PTA), speech reception thresholds, word recognition scores, and air-bone gaps (AB gaps). Mean follow-up was 11 months (range 2 to 22 months). The mean PTA improved from 57 dB to 37 dB, whereas the mean AB gaps decreased from 33 dB to 16 dB. There were no cases of infection or extrusion.
CONCLUSIONS: Hydroxyapatite bone cement is an excellent adjunct or alternative to ossiculoplasty with preformed prostheses. Easily malleable, rapidly setting, and rapidly hardening, Mimix is particularly well suited for middle ear work. SIGNIFICANCE: Definitive fixation with bone cements during difficult ossicular chain reconstruction may ensure a more enduring successful outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15886626     DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  14 in total

1.  Ossicular reconstruction: hydroxyapatite bone cement versus incus remodelling: how to manage incudostapedial discontinuity.

Authors:  Thomas Somers; Vincent Van Rompaey; Gerd Claes; Liesbeth Salembier; Joost van Dinther; Zarowski Andrzej; Erwin Offeciers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Review of bone substitutes.

Authors:  Landon S Pryor; Earl Gage; Claude-Jean Langevin; Fernando Herrera; Andrew D Breithaupt; Chad R Gordon; Ahmed M Afifi; James E Zins; Hal Meltzer; Amanda Gosman; Steve R Cohen; Ralph Holmes
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-10

3.  Two different techniques to facilitate reconstruction of the long incus process with bone cement: a feasibility study in human cadaveric temporal bones.

Authors:  Holger Kaftan; Achim Göpferich; Silke Kaftan; Werner Hosemann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Biomaterials in orthopaedics.

Authors:  M Navarro; A Michiardi; O Castaño; J A Planell
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Comparison of glass ionomer cement and incus interposition in reconstruction of incus long process defects.

Authors:  Huseyin Dere; Fatih Ozdogan; K Murat Ozcan; Adin Selcuk; Ibrahim Ozcan; Gokhan Gokturk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Evaluation on shear bond strength of different glass ionomer and hydroxy apatite cements used in ossiculoplasty.

Authors:  M Tayyar Kalcıoğlu; İsmail Hakkı Uzun; Muhammet Yalçın; Meral Arslan Malkoç; Ayşe Tuba Öğreten; Fatih Mehmet Hanege
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.021

7.  Ossiculoplasty with hydroxyapatite bone cement: our reconstruction philosophy.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Gérard; Gersende De Bie; Daniel Franceschi; Naima Deggouj; Michel Gersdorff
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Revision stapes surgery for lysis of the long process of the incus: comparing hydroxyapatite bone cement versus malleovestibulopexy and total ossicular replacement prosthesis.

Authors:  Vincent Pitiot; Ruben Hermann; Stéphane Tringali; Christian Dubreuil; Eric Truy
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  In-office ossicular chain reconstruction using hydroxyapatite cement.

Authors:  Donald Tan; Mehdi Abouzari; Khodayar Goshtasbi; Brandyn Dunn; Hamid R Djalilian
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 2.597

10.  Magnetic Field Effects on Bone Repair after Calcium Phosphate Cement Implants: Histometric and Biochemistry Evaluation.

Authors:  Thiago Calcagnotto; Marcos Miguel Bechstedt Schwengber; Carlos Cesar De Antoni; Danilo Louzada de Oliveira; Théssio Mina Vago; Jessica Guilinelli
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.