Literature DB >> 15886379

Association between phonocardiographic third and fourth heart sounds and objective measures of left ventricular function.

Gregory M Marcus1, Ivor L Gerber, Barry H McKeown, Joshua C Vessey, Mark V Jordan, Michele Huddleston, Charles E McCulloch, Elyse Foster, Kanu Chatterjee, Andrew D Michaels.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The third (S3) and fourth (S4) heart sounds detected by phonocardiography are considered to represent the criterion standards of the gallop sounds, but their test characteristics have not been explored.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic test characteristics of the S3 and S4 for prediction of left ventricular dysfunction using a computerized heart sound detection algorithm. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective study of 90 adult patients undergoing elective left-sided heart catheterization at a single US teaching hospital between August 2003 and June 2004. The mean age was 62 (SD, 13) years (range, 24-90 years) and 61 (68%) were male. Within a 4-hour period, participants underwent computerized heart sound phonocardiographic analysis, cardiac catheterization, transthoracic echocardiography, and blood sampling for assessment of an S3/S4, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic test characteristics of the computerized phonocardiographic S3 and S4 using markers of left ventricular function as criterion standards.
RESULTS: Mean (SD) LVEDP was significantly elevated (18.4 [6.9] mm Hg vs 12.1 [7.3] mm Hg; P<.001), mean (SD) LVEF was reduced (49.4% [20.2%] vs 63.6% [14.8%]; P<.001), and median (interquartile range) BNP was elevated (330 [98-1155] pg/mL vs 86 [41-192] pg/mL; P<.001) in those with an S3, S4, or both compared with patients without a diastolic heart sound. The sensitivities of these heart sounds to detect an elevated LVEDP, reduced LVEF, or elevated BNP were 41%, 52%, and 32% for an S3, and 46%, 43%, and 40% for an S4, respectively. For abnormal levels of the same markers of ventricular function, the specificities of the S3 were 92%, 87%, and 92%, while the specificities of the S4 were 80%, 72%, and 78%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Neither the phonocardiographic S3 nor the S4 is a sensitive marker of left ventricular dysfunction. The phonocardiographic S3 is specific for left ventricular dysfunction and appears to be superior to the moderate specificity of the phonocardiographic S4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15886379     DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.18.2238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  15 in total

1.  Acoustic cardiography to improve detection of coronary artery disease with stress testing.

Authors:  Michel Zuber; Paul Erne
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2010-05-26

2.  Continuous respiratory monitoring for sleep apnea screening by ambulatory hemodynamic monitor.

Authors:  Roger Dillier; Markus Baumann; Mabelle Young; Susanne Erne; Bernhard Schwizer; Michel Zuber; Paul Erne
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2012-04-26

3.  Relationship between accurate auscultation of the fourth heart sound and the level of physician experience.

Authors:  Saurabh Gupta; Andrew D Michaels
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 4.  The third heart sound for diagnosis of acute heart failure.

Authors:  Michael Johnston; Sean P Collins; Alan B Storrow
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2007-09

5.  Association of the fourth heart sound with increased left ventricular end-diastolic stiffness.

Authors:  Sanjiv J Shah; Kenta Nakamura; Gregory M Marcus; Ivor L Gerber; Barry H McKeown; Mark V Jordan; Michele Huddleston; Elyse Foster; Andrew D Michaels
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 5.712

6.  Sequence of electrocardiographic and acoustic cardiographic changes and angina during coronary occlusion and reperfusion in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Eunyoung Lee; Barbara J Drew; Ronald H Selvester; Andrew D Michaels
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.468

7.  Heart energy signature spectrogram for cardiovascular diagnosis.

Authors:  Vladimir Kudriavtsev; Vladimir Polyshchuk; Douglas L Roy
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Clinical characteristics of emergency department heart failure patients initially diagnosed as non-heart failure.

Authors:  Sean P Collins; Christopher J Lindsell; W Frank Peacock; Daniel C Eckert; Jeff Askew; Alan B Storrow
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2006-11-14

9.  Haemodynamic and structural correlates of the first and second heart sounds in pulmonary arterial hypertension: an acoustic cardiography cohort study.

Authors:  William Chan; Maryam Woldeyohannes; Rebecca Colman; Patti Arand; Andrew D Michaels; John D Parker; John T Granton; Susanna Mak
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Haemodynamic monitoring of cardiac status using heart sounds from an implanted cardiac device.

Authors:  Pramodsingh H Thakur; Qi An; Lynne Swanson; Yi Zhang; Roy S Gardner
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2017-07-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.