Literature DB >> 15885666

Properties of neurons in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis responding to noxious dural and facial stimulation.

S Bolton1, C T O'Shaughnessy, P J Goadsby.   

Abstract

Extracellular single unit recordings were made in the rat trigeminal nucleus caudalis (Vc) from cells with Adelta and C-fibre latency responding to electrical stimulation of the thinned cranium overlying the middle meningeal artery (MMA). The neurons had an ipsilateral facial receptive field (FRF) that mainly extended over areas innervated by the first and second division of the trigeminal nerve but in some cases also included areas innervated by the third division of the trigeminal nerve. No wind-up of either long latency C-fibre or short latency Adelta responses was seen during trains of electrical stimulation. Sensitisation of mechanical stimulation of the FRF could also not be observed at any time during dural stimulation. In contrast, extracellular single unit recordings in the Vc activated by electrical stimulation of the facial skin resulted in a significant wind-up response of long latency response in six of ten cells studied. The facial-elicited wind-up response was significantly enhanced, 18 min after the electrical stimulation protocol was started, indicating that the process of wind-up had generated central excitability. The findings in this study demonstrate a clear difference between the effects of electrical stimulation of cutaneous and non-cutaneous inputs. In the trigeminal system, this has implications for the study of pathways such as those involved in headache, where it is believed that an enhanced dural input to the Vc may generate central sensitisation and partly explain the hyperalgesia and allodynia reported by patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15885666     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.03.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  5 in total

1.  Differential activation of the human trigeminal nuclear complex by noxious and non-noxious orofacial stimulation.

Authors:  Paul G Nash; Vaughan G Macefield; Iven J Klineberg; Greg M Murray; Luke A Henderson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Paraventricular hypothalamic regulation of trigeminovascular mechanisms involved in headaches.

Authors:  Claude Robert; Laurence Bourgeais; Charles-Daniel Arreto; Miguel Condes-Lara; Rodrigo Noseda; Thérèse Jay; Luis Villanueva
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Pain remapping in migraine: a novel characteristic following trigeminal nerve injury.

Authors:  Aamir Hussain; Marlind A Stiles; Michael L Oshinsky
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 5.887

4.  Esmolol modulates inhibitory neurotransmission in the substantia gelatinosa of the spinal trigeminal nucleus of the rat.

Authors:  Yutaka Yasui; Eiji Masaki; Fusao Kato
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Spinal trigeminal neurons demonstrate an increase in responses to dural electrical stimulation in the orofacial formalin test.

Authors:  Alexey Y Sokolov; Olga A Lyubashina; Sergey S Panteleev
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 7.277

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.