Literature DB >> 15885353

Evaluation of the increase in model for end-stage liver disease (DeltaMELD) score over time as a prognostic predictor in patients with advanced cirrhosis: risk factor analysis and comparison with initial MELD and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score.

Teh-Ia Huo1, Jaw-Ching Wu, Han-Chieh Lin, Fa-Yauh Lee, Ming-Chih Hou, Pui-Ching Lee, Full-Young Chang, Shou-Dong Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) has been used to prioritize cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation. The change in MELD score over time (DeltaMELD) may have additional prognostic value. We investigated the ability of DeltaMELD to predict the outcome of advanced cirrhosis and prospectively assessed the factors associated with increasing DeltaMELD.
METHODS: Risk factors were determined in 58 prospectively followed-up patients. The predictive power of DeltaMELD, initial MELD and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score was compared by using c-statistic in 351 patients.
RESULTS: Ascites (P=0.020) and hepatic encephalopathy (P=0.023) were significantly associated with increasing MELD score at 3 months. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for DeltaMELD/month was 0.779 compared with 0.718 for MELD (P=0.130) and 0.528 for CTP score (P<0.001) at 6 months; the area was 0.822, 0.744 and 0.528, respectively (P=0.018 and <0.001, respectively) at 12 months. DeltaMELD/month >2.5 was the only significant prognostic predictor at 6 (odds ratio: 9.8, P<0.001) and 12 months (odds ratio: 16.3, P<0.001) in multivariate logistic analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing MELD score is associated with the onset of ascites and encephalopathy. DeltaMELD is superior to initial MELD and CTP scores to predict intermediate term outcome in patients with advanced cirrhosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15885353     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatol        ISSN: 0168-8278            Impact factor:   25.083


  45 in total

1.  Delta MELD as a predictor of early outcome in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Şencan Acar; Murat Akyıldız; Ahmet Gürakar; Yaman Tokat; Murat Dayangaç
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 2.  Prioritization for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Evangelos Cholongitas; Giacomo Germani; Andrew K Burroughs
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Serum lactate level predict mortality in elderly patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Adnan Tas; Erdem Akbal; Yavuz Beyazit; Erdem Kocak
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 4.  Model for end-stage liver disease: end of the first decade.

Authors:  Sumeet K Asrani; W Ray Kim
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 6.126

5.  Oral tocotrienols are transported to human tissues and delay the progression of the model for end-stage liver disease score in patients.

Authors:  Viren Patel; Cameron Rink; Gayle M Gordillo; Savita Khanna; Urmila Gnyawali; Sashwati Roy; Bassel Shneker; Kasturi Ganesh; Gary Phillips; J Layne More; Atom Sarkar; Robert Kirkpatrick; Elmahdi A Elkhammas; Emily Klatte; Michael Miller; Michael S Firstenberg; E Antonio Chiocca; Kalanithi Nesaretnam; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Value of MELD and MELD-based indices in surgical risk evaluation of cirrhotic patients: retrospective analysis of 190 cases.

Authors:  Beatriz P Costa; F Castro Sousa; Marco Serôdio; César Carvalho
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Advances in liver transplantation allocation systems.

Authors:  Michael L Schilsky; Maryam Moini
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Cholestasis and endogenous opioids: liver disease and exogenous opioid pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Mellar Davis
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  [Model for end-stage liver disease. New basis of allocation for liver transplantations].

Authors:  G E Jung; J Encke; J Schmidt; A Rahmel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Limitations of the MELD score in predicting mortality or need for removal from waiting list in patients awaiting liver transplantation.

Authors:  Daniel Gotthardt; Karl Heinz Weiss; Melanie Baumgärtner; Alexandra Zahn; Wolfgang Stremmel; Jan Schmidt; Thomas Bruckner; Peter Sauer
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.