Literature DB >> 15884782

A national survey of laboratory animal workers concerning occupational risks for zoonotic diseases.

Benjamin J Weigler1, Ronald F Di Giacomo, Susan Alexander.   

Abstract

In this cross-sectional survey of laboratory animal workers in the United States, 23 of 1367 persons reported 28 cases of infection with zoonotic agents from research animals at their workplace during the past 5 years, with six persons indicating that their infections were medically confirmed. Based on these data, the annualized incidence rate for work-related transmission of zoonotic agents from laboratory animals was 45 cases per 10,000 worker-years at risk (95% confidence interval, 30 to 65 cases), approximating the rate for nonfatal occupational illnesses in the agricultural production-livestock industry and for those employed in the health services during 2002. Logistic regression analysis found various characteristics of persons and their employers that were significantly associated with the likelihood of having been medically evaluated for exposure to a zoonotic agent from laboratory animals. Most (95.595% +/- 1.1%) persons working with laboratory animals or their tissues indicated that they knew whom to talk to at their institution for medical evaluation and care should they be concerned about the possibility of an occupationally acquired zoonotic disease in future. However, occupational illnesses and exposures among laboratory animal workers was underreported, as 10 of the 28 (36%) alleged zoonotic disease cases were not communicated to the employee's supervisor. Lack of concern about the potential significance to their health and the perception of punitive consequences to the employee were some of the reasons cited for underreporting, an issue which must be vigorously addressed in the interests of continuing progress toward zoonotic disease prevention in this field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15884782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Med        ISSN: 1532-0820            Impact factor:   0.982


  5 in total

1.  Comparative Risk of Human Injury/Exposure While Collecting Blood from Sedated and Unsedated Nonhuman Primates.

Authors:  Charlotte E Hotchkiss; Melinda A Young
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Risk-based immunization policies and tuberculosis screening practices for animal care and research workers in the United States: survey results and recommendations.

Authors:  Benjamin J Weigler; Donna R Cooper; F Claire Hankenson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Laboratory Animal Workers' Attitudes and Perceptions Concerning Occupational Risk and Injury.

Authors:  Eric D Steelman; Jeffrey L Alexander
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 4.  Comparative Review of Antimicrobial Resistance in Humans and Nonhuman Primates.

Authors:  Jeffrey Kim; Dondrae J Coble; Gregory W Salyards; Gregory G Habing
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 0.982

5.  Development of Improved Devices for Handling and Restraining Experimental Laboratory Mice.

Authors:  Moshe Aftalion; David Gur; Noach Shalom; Yinon Levy; Avital Tidhar; Yaron Vagima; Ayelet Zauberman; Tseela David; Amir Rosner; Shay Weiss; Emanuelle Mamroud
Journal:  Appl Biosaf       Date:  2020-03-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.