Literature DB >> 15884127

Effect of water-soluble contrast in colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized trial.

Jia-Hui Chen1, Chung-Bao Hsieh, Pei-Chieh Chao, Hsiao-Dung Liu, Chung-Jueng Chen, Yao-Chi Liu, Jyh-Cherng Yu.   

Abstract

AIM: Postoperative gastrointestinal-tract motility is normally delayed. Early feeding after colorectal surgery has been reported recently, but late feeding is common. Gastrografin not only enhances bowel peristalsis, but also decreases bowel-wall edema. Whether contrast medium allows early oral feeding and reduces the duration of hospitalization requires clarification.
METHODS: Fifty patients underwent elective colorectal surgery in a regional medical center. Patients were prospectively randomized into a Gastrografin group or control group (n = 25 each). Patients in the Gastrografin group began their feeding schedule with 100 mL of 5% dextrose water with 100 mL of Gastrografin on postoperative d 3 and were advanced to a full liquid diet when the contrast reached the colon in 4 h. Patients in the control group began their feeding schedule with 200 mL of 5% dextrose water on postoperative d 3 and were advanced to a full liquid diet after the passage of flatus and stool. Nasogastric tubes were inserted for persistent postoperative vomiting. Fullness, nausea, vomiting, complications, time of anesthesia, time of operation, time of mobilization, time of oral feeding, and duration of hospital stay were recorded and analyzed with Student's t-test.
RESULTS: In the Gastrografin group, one patient had aspiration pneumonia and one patient had anastomotic leakage resulting in sepsis and eventual death. This mortality was excluded from the subsequent statistical analysis. In the control group, two patients had wound infections. There was no significant difference between the two groups at the time of anesthesia, time of operation, or time of mobilization. There were significant differences between the two groups in the time of oral feeding (3.3+/-0.3 d in the Gastrografin group vs 4.8+/-0.4 d in the control group; P = odds ratio--, 95%CI [-0.5 to +0.7 d]) and in the length of hospital stay (7.6+/-1.1 d in the Gastrografin group vs 10.2+/-1.3 d in the control group; P = odds ratio--, 95% CI [-1.2 to +1.4 d]).
CONCLUSION: Gastrografin not only allowed early oral feeding but also reduced the duration of hospitalization after elective colorectal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15884127      PMCID: PMC4305921          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i18.2802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  20 in total

Review 1.  A review of the management of small bowel obstruction. Members of the Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study (SCAR).

Authors:  M S Wilson; H Ellis; D Menzies; B J Moran; M C Parker; J N Thompson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Standardized perioperative care protocols and reduced length of stay after colon surgery.

Authors:  B G Bradshaw; S S Liu; R C Thirlby
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Anaphylactoid reactions with gastrointestinal contrast media.

Authors:  J Skucas
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  'Fast track' postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  C P Delaney; V W Fazio; A J Senagore; B Robinson; A L Halverson; F H Remzi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Pathophysiology of postoperative ileus.

Authors:  J Smith; K A Kelly; R M Weinshilboum
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1977-02

6.  The effect of intraoperative thoracic epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia on bowel function after colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  F Carli; J L Trudel; P Belliveau
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Therapeutic effect of oral Gastrografin in adhesive, partial small-bowel obstruction: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  A Assalia; M Schein; D Kopelman; A Hirshberg; M Hashmonai
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Water-soluble contrast study predicts the need for early surgery in adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  S C Chen; F Y Lin; P H Lee; S C Yu; S M Wang; K J Chang
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 9.  Is early oral feeding safe after elective colorectal surgery? A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  P Reissman; T A Teoh; S M Cohen; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Water-soluble contrast material has no therapeutic effect on postoperative small-bowel obstruction: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  E Feigin; D Seror; A Szold; M Carmon; T M Allweis; A Nissan; E Gross; A Vromen; H R Freund
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Is gum chewing useful for ileus after elective colorectal surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Wenceslao Vásquez; Adrián V Hernández; Jose Luis Garcia-Sabrido
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Early removing gastrointestinal decompression and early oral feeding improve patients' rehabilitation after colorectostomy.

Authors:  Tong Zhou; Xiao-Ting Wu; Ye-Jiang Zhou; Xiong Huang; Wei Fan; Yue-Chun Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The efficacy and safety of prokinetics in critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding tubes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rong Peng; Hailong Li; Lijun Yang; Linan Zeng; Qiusha Yi; Peipei Xu; Xiangcheng Pan; Lingli Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.