Literature DB >> 1588365

Patient compliance with oral chemotherapy as assessed by a novel electronic technique.

C R Lee1, P W Nicholson, R L Souhami, A A Deshmukh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous reports have suggested low rates of compliance with the oral component of cancer chemotherapy, which, if confirmed, would have serious implications on treatment. Because of the uncertainties in the methodology used in previous studies, we have assessed compliance with a novel technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An "intelligent" tablet bottle was used, which, unknown to the patient, electronically records the times of opening over a period of weeks. The records were scored for overall compliance (total number of bottle openings as a percentage of the prescribed number) and for daily and hourly irregularity indices. Twenty-one patients undergoing treatment for Hodgkin's or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were monitored for a total of 65 treatment periods, each of up to 2 weeks (852 days in total). Eight measures of side effects and quality of life were self-assessed daily by the patients using a diary card.
RESULTS: The overall compliance was 100.6% +/- 20.6% (mean +/- SD). Overall compliance was lower (mean reduction, 10%) in treatment periods with drugs prescribed to be taken three times a day. It was not possible to demonstrate convincingly any relationship between compliance and any of the following: drug type, monitoring period sequence, the diary card scores of side effects and quality of life, number of relapses, and time since initial diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: These results are reassuring, but further work is in progress to measure compliance in other treatment regimens in which the side effects are more severe and the prognosis is worse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1588365     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.6.1007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  10 in total

Review 1.  Effects of food on the clinical pharmacokinetics of anticancer agents: underlying mechanisms and implications for oral chemotherapy.

Authors:  Brahma N Singh; Bimal K Malhotra
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Maximizing the effectiveness of oral therapies in lymphoid cancers: research gaps and unmet needs.

Authors:  Alix Y L Zackon; Amy A Ayers; Katherine A Yeager; Mary L Somma; Jonathan W Friedberg; Christopher R Flowers; Loretta J Nastoupil
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2019-06-04

Review 3.  The pursuit of optimal outcomes in cancer therapy in a new age of rationally designed target-based anticancer agents.

Authors:  E K Rowinsky
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Oral antineoplastic agents: how do we care about adherence?

Authors:  Marie Barillet; Virginie Prevost; Florence Joly; Bénédicte Clarisse
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  MRC quality of life studies using a daily diary card--practical lessons learned from cancer trials.

Authors:  P Fayers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Oral chemotherapy agents in the treatment of leukaemia.

Authors:  R B Geller; S P Dix
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Oral anticancer drugs in the elderly: an overview.

Authors:  Sara Lonardi; Alberto Bortolami; Micaela Stefani; Silvio Monfardini
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 8.  Oral cancer treatment: developments in chemotherapy and beyond.

Authors:  V J O'Neill; C J Twelves
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-10-21       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Oral anticancer agent medication adherence by outpatients.

Authors:  Michio Kimura; Eiseki Usami; Mina Iwai; Toshiya Nakao; Tomoaki Yoshimura; Hiromi Mori; Tadashi Sugiyama; Hitomi Teramachi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Patient compliance with prolonged low-dose oral etoposide for small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C R Lee; P W Nicholson; R L Souhami; M L Slevin; M R Hall; A A Deshmukh
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.