BACKGROUND: Recent developments in sensor-servomotor-driven microscopes again initiated a discussion on the value of such technology for practical use in neurosurgery. The need for less force in moving a motor-supported microscope is advantageous. However, questions remain if well-known difficulties in the past such as resonance phenomenon, loss of natural feeling, and unequal handling forces in different situations have been overcome by the new generation of sensor-servo-supported surgical microscopes. METHODS: Handling forces of a mechanically counterbalanced neurosurgical microscope (Zeiss NC4, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) were compared with those of a sensor-servo-supported neurosurgical microscope (Moeller HiR 20-1000, Moeller, Wedel, Germany). Handling forces were correlated with the surface electromyogram measurement of the muscle activity of 4 neurosurgeons. The activity of the forearm muscles was measured while handling the 2 different microscopes in standardized tests. RESULTS: The electrophysiologic measurement revealed that significantly less muscle activity was required to handle the sensor-servo-driven microscope in all directions. The untrained surgeons profited less than the skilled ones. Differences were most evident with disbalanced microscopes. CONCLUSIONS: With this technology, the neurosurgeons exerted less effort, especially in strenuous test situations where the single-handed use of the microscope was mandatory. The reduced muscle forces that move the sensor-servo-type microscope and the continuously balanced state that might help prevent unwanted correction movements will ease intraoperative handling in general.
BACKGROUND: Recent developments in sensor-servomotor-driven microscopes again initiated a discussion on the value of such technology for practical use in neurosurgery. The need for less force in moving a motor-supported microscope is advantageous. However, questions remain if well-known difficulties in the past such as resonance phenomenon, loss of natural feeling, and unequal handling forces in different situations have been overcome by the new generation of sensor-servo-supported surgical microscopes. METHODS: Handling forces of a mechanically counterbalanced neurosurgical microscope (Zeiss NC4, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) were compared with those of a sensor-servo-supported neurosurgical microscope (Moeller HiR 20-1000, Moeller, Wedel, Germany). Handling forces were correlated with the surface electromyogram measurement of the muscle activity of 4 neurosurgeons. The activity of the forearm muscles was measured while handling the 2 different microscopes in standardized tests. RESULTS: The electrophysiologic measurement revealed that significantly less muscle activity was required to handle the sensor-servo-driven microscope in all directions. The untrained surgeons profited less than the skilled ones. Differences were most evident with disbalanced microscopes. CONCLUSIONS: With this technology, the neurosurgeons exerted less effort, especially in strenuous test situations where the single-handed use of the microscope was mandatory. The reduced muscle forces that move the sensor-servo-type microscope and the continuously balanced state that might help prevent unwanted correction movements will ease intraoperative handling in general.