Literature DB >> 15882757

Measurement of the mechanical characteristics of benign prostatic tissue: a novel method for assessing benign prostatic disease.

S Phipps1, T H J Yang, F K Habib, R L Reuben, S A McNeill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between the morphology and the mechanical properties of benign prostatic tissues measured in vitro.
METHODS: Fresh tissue specimens were collected from 17 patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction. Individual tissue specimens underwent immediate mechanical testing, by applying a dynamic compressive strain to the samples. The amplitude ratio (E*) and phase difference (tan delta), measures of tissue elastic and viscous components, were derived. Individual sections from the processed specimens underwent immunohistochemical staining and computerized image analysis to measure the morphologic characteristics of each transurethral resection of the prostate chipping. Correlations between the morphologic and mechanical measurements were assessed.
RESULTS: A strong positive correlation was found between prostatic smooth muscle content and (E*) (R2 = 0.58, P = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study have demonstrated that strong correlations exist between prostatic tissue morphology and mechanical characteristics. We believe that the ability to quantify prostatic tissue mechanical characteristics in vivo may be of clinical benefit in the future assessment and treatment of benign prostatic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15882757     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  8 in total

1.  Prostate tissue stiffness as measured with a resonance sensor system: a study on silicone and human prostate tissue in vitro.

Authors:  Simon Phipps
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Congruence of imaging estimators and mechanical measurements of viscoelastic properties of soft tissues.

Authors:  Man Zhang; Benjamin Castaneda; Zhe Wu; Priya Nigwekar; Jean V Joseph; Deborah J Rubens; Kevin J Parker
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Prostate tissue stiffness as measured with a resonance sensor system: a study on silicone and human prostate tissue in vitro.

Authors:  Ville Jalkanen; Britt M Andersson; Anders Bergh; Börje Ljungberg; Olof A Lindahl
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-06-10       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Automated Compression Device for Viscoelasticity Imaging.

Authors:  Alireza Nabavizadeh; Randall R Kinnick; Mahdi Bayat; Carolina Amador; Matthew W Urban; Azra Alizad; Mostafa Fatemi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Magnetic resonance elastography of the prostate in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: feasibility of the modified driver at high multi-frequencies.

Authors:  Ying Deng; Zhuoya Yi; Tianhui Zhang; Bing Hu; Linqi Zhang; Kritisha Rajlawot; Sichi Kuang; Bingjun He; Arvin Arani; Jun Chen; Meng Yin; Phillip Rossman; Kevin J Glaser; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Richard L Ehman; Jin Wang
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-10-11

Review 6.  New and Emerging Applications of Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Other Abdominal Organs.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Ying Deng; Danielle Jondal; David M Woodrum; Yu Shi; Meng Yin; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10

7.  Histology-based homogenization analysis of soft tissue: application to prostate cancer.

Authors:  Javier Palacio-Torralba; Daniel W Good; S Alan McNeill; Robert L Reuben; Yuhang Chen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  A novel method for rapid and quantitative mechanical assessment of soft tissue for diagnostic purposes: A computational study.

Authors:  Javier Palacio-Torralba; Daniel W Good; Grant D Stewart; S Alan McNeill; Robert L Reuben; Yuhang Chen
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.747

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.