Literature DB >> 1588220

Experimental study of the efficacy of the endoluminal prosthesis in colonic anastomoses.

J Serra1, G Capella, J Esquius, R Montañes, X Rius.   

Abstract

Colorectal surgery is still associated with a significant morbidity and mortality rate, mostly related to suture failure. We have carried out a randomized experimental study in dogs on colonic anastomoses exposed to a number of anastomotic risk situations. A total of 42 dogs was used. They were divided into three study groups (control, occlusion and diverticulitis), with and without an endoluminal tube. The aim was to assess the efficacy of the endoluminal prosthesis using clinical and radiological assessment of anastomotic healing. Pre- and post-anastomotic intraluminal pressures were also measured to determine whether these might be a factor in suture failure. There were significant differences in suture failure in animals in which the endoluminal tube was used. Mean duration of placement was 10.5 days. In the colon healing study, no significant differences were found between the groups in the pathological examination or in the assay of hydroxyproline content. The presence of the endoluminal tube may increase the maximum pressure applied on the colon wall. No significant differences were found in the intracolonic pressure differentials between the different groups or after the inclusion of the endoluminal prosthesis. The results obtained establish the efficacy of the endoluminal prosthesis in protecting the colonic anastomosis, and could be a valuable technique in colonic anastomoses with a high risk of suture dehiscence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1588220     DOI: 10.1007/bf01647656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  29 in total

1.  A comparison of one layer and two layer techniques for colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  W G Everett
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Evaluation of polyglycolic aicd sutures in colon anastomoses.

Authors:  E R Letwin
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Single layer anastomosis after rectosigmoid resection.

Authors:  N A Matheson; A D Irving
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  The intracolonic bypass procedure.

Authors:  B Ravo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Experience with the Russian model 249 suture gun for anastomosis of the rectum.

Authors:  J C Goligher; P W Lee; J Macfie; K C Simpkins; D J Lintott
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1979-04

6.  Collagenase activity in the gastro-intestinal tract.

Authors:  P R Hawley; W P Faulk; T K Hunt; J E Dunphy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  An experimental comparison of inversion and eversion colonic anastomoses.

Authors:  A J McAdams; G Meikle; R Medina
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1969 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Prevention and treatment of intestinal dehiscence by an intraluminal bypass graft.

Authors:  R Ger; B Ravo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Management of esophageal dehiscences by an intraluminal bypass tube. An experimental study.

Authors:  B Ravo; R Ger
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  A comparative radiographic study of low anterior colon anastomoses in dogs.

Authors:  M P Bubrick; J W Lundeen; C R Hitchcock
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Can intraluminal devices prevent or reduce colorectal anastomotic leakage: a review.

Authors:  Annelien N Morks; Klaas Havenga; Rutger J Ploeg
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.