Literature DB >> 15882150

Usefulness of embolic protection devices during saphenous vein graft intervention in a nonselected population.

Leslie A Webb1, Simon R Dixon, Robert D Safian, William W O'Neill.   

Abstract

Distal embolic protection devices have been shown to reduce the risk of peri-procedural complications associated with saphenous vein graft intervention. However, there are several important anatomic limitations that may preclude routine device use. We analyzed the angiograms of 624 consecutive saphenous vein graft interventions to determine eligibility for use of a proximal or distal embolic protection system. Overall, 483 (77%) of cases had anatomic and lesion characteristics suitable for an embolic protection device, including 59% eligible for proximal protection and 57% for distal protection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15882150     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2005.04063.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 0896-4327            Impact factor:   2.279


  4 in total

Review 1.  Secondary revascularization after CABG surgery.

Authors:  Javier Escaned
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Non-invasive embolus trap using histotripsy-an acoustic parameter study.

Authors:  Simone Park; Adam D Maxwell; Gabe E Owens; Hitinder S Gurm; Charles A Cain; Zhen Xu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Saphenous vein graft interventions.

Authors:  Emmanouil S Brilakis; Michael Lee; Julinda Mehilli; Konstantinos Marmagkiolis; Josep Rodes-Cabau; Rajesh Sachdeva; Anna Kotsia; George Christopoulos; Bavana V Rangan; Atif Mohammed; Subhash Banerjee
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-05

Review 4.  Embolic protection devices in saphenous vein graft and native vessel percutaneous intervention: a review.

Authors:  Eron Sturm; David Goldberg; Sheldon Goldberg
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2012-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.