Literature DB >> 15882007

Results of a national survey of US veterinary college faculty regarding attitudes toward farm animal welfare.

Camie R Heleski1, Angela G Mertig, Adroaldo J Zanella.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine attitudes toward farm animal welfare among veterinary college faculty.
DESIGN: E-mail survey. STUDY POPULATION: 157 US veterinary college faculty with large animal or food animal emphasis. PROCEDURE: Veterinarians from 27 US veterinary colleges were contacted via e-mail and asked to complete a 7-page survey relating to farm animal welfare issues. Thirty-one percent of those contacted responded.
RESULTS: 71% of respondents self-characterized their attitude toward farm animal welfare as "we can use animals for the greater human good but have an obligation to provide for the majority of the animals' physiologic and behavioral needs." An additional 19% of respondents were more concerned about animal welfare than was indicated by that statement, and 10% were less concerned about farm animal welfare than was indicated by that statement. Significant relationships among demographic variables and attitude scores were observed, including more concerned attitudes among females, those with more liberal political views, and those who cited lower religiosity. No relationship between attitude and age was observed. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Veterinary college faculty have the opportunity to impact many stakeholders within the animal agriculture industries (eg, future veterinarians and policy makers looking for a veterinary science perspective). Results indicated that a considerable level of concern toward farm animal welfare is present in this population. Although the process of change may not be rapid, it is likely that the influence of these respondents will factor heavily into enhancing farm animal welfare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15882007     DOI: 10.2460/javma.2005.226.1538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc        ISSN: 0003-1488            Impact factor:   1.936


  7 in total

1.  What Difference Does a Visit Make? Changes in Animal Welfare Perceptions after Interested Citizens Tour a Dairy Farm.

Authors:  Beth Ann Ventura; Marina A G von Keyserlingk; Hannah Wittman; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Factors influencing public support for dairy tie stall housing in the U.S.

Authors:  Jesse A Robbins; Caitlin Roberts; Daniel M Weary; Becca Franks; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A Nationwide Survey of Animal Science Students' Perceptions of Animal Welfare across Different Animal Categories at Institutions in the United States.

Authors:  Paxton Sullivan; Sage Mijares; Melissa Davis; Katrina Oselinsky; Catie Cramer; Noa Román-Muñiz; Lorann Stallones; Lily Edwards-Callaway
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.231

4.  Perception of animal sentience by Brazilian and French citizens: The case of sheep welfare and sentience.

Authors:  Priscilla Regina Tamioso; Daniel Santiago Rucinque; Mara Miele; Alain Boissy; Carla Forte Maiolino Molento
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Why Should Human-Animal Interactions Be Included in Research of Working Equids' Welfare?

Authors:  Daniela Luna; Tamara A Tadich
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Chinese Public Attitudes towards, and Knowledge of, Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Francesca Carnovale; Xiao Jin; David Arney; Kris Descovich; Wenliang Guo; Binlin Shi; Clive J C Phillips
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Chinese College Students' Attitudes towards Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Sara Platto; Agathe Serres; Ai Jingyi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.