Literature DB >> 15881530

Atrial and ventricular volume and function in persistent and permanent atrial fibrillation, a magnetic resonance imaging study.

Susette Krohn Therkelsen1, Bjoern Aaris Groenning, Jesper Hastrup Svendsen, Gorm Boje Jensen.   

Abstract

Left atrial size is independently related to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and atrial fibrillation (AF) is strongly associated with atrial size. Our aims were to report atrial and ventricular dimensions in patients with AF evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to assess the inter-study reproducibility of the measurements. Nineteen healthy volunteers, 19 patients with permanent AF, and 58 patients with persistent AF had cardiac dimensions evaluated by 6-mm cinematographic breath-hold MRI scans using a 1.5 Tesla Siemens Vision Magnetom scanner with a phased array chest coil. Intraobserver variability and inter-study reproducibility of the cardiac volumes and ejection fractions (EF) gave acceptable Bland-Altman plots, good correlations (R2: 0.80-0.99), and low reproducibility coefficients. The mean atrial volumes were similar in the two groups with AF [systolic vol. index (SVI): 75.9-80.3 mL/m2; diastolic vol. index (DVI): 77.4-82.1 mL/m2] and significantly different from the healthy volunteers (SVI: 30.3 mL/m2; DVI: 62.3 mL/m2; p < 0.0001). Mean left ventricular (LV) volumes and EF were significantly different in permanent AF (SVI: 34.2 mL/m2; DVI: 68.3 mL/m2; EF: 50.8%) compared to persistent AF [SVI: 44.0 mL/m2 (p = 0.02); DVI: 77.2 mL/m2 (p = 0.03); EF: 44.9% (p = 0.02)], and closer to the normal values (SVI: 22.4 mL/m2; DVI: 66.5 mL/m2; EF: 67.0%). MRI is a highly reproducible method for measurement of atrial and ventricular dimensions in healthy volunteers and in patients with AF. Our results suggest that atrial dilatation appears within the first months of AF and stays more or less unchanged thereafter. The LV appears to dilate early as a response to AF, but later seems to adapt.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15881530     DOI: 10.1081/jcmr-200053618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson        ISSN: 1097-6647            Impact factor:   5.364


  21 in total

1.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Bayes Syndrome and Imaging Techniques.

Authors:  Ivan Hernandez-Betancor; Maria Manuela Izquierdo-Gomez; Javier Garcia-Niebla; Ignacio Laynez-Cerdena; Martin Jesus Garcia-Gonzalez; A Barragan-Acea; Jose Luis Irribarren-Sarria; Juan Jose Jimenez-Rivera; Juan Lacalzada-Almeida
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2017

4.  [Clinical indications for the use of cardiac MRI. By the SIRM Study Group on Cardiac Imaging].

Authors:  E Di Cesare; F Cademartiri; I Carbone; A Carriero; M Centonze; F De Cobelli; R De Rosa; P Di Renzi; A Esposito; R Faletti; R Fattori; M Francone; A Giovagnoni; L La Grutta; G Ligabue; L Lovato; R Marano; M Midiri; A Romagnoli; V Russo; F Sardanelli; L Natale; J Bogaert; A De Roos
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  End-systolic and end-diastolic left atrial volume assessment by two-dimensional echocardiography: a comparison study with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kiyoko Uno; Yoshihiro Seo; Tomoko Ishizu; Takeshi Inaba; Fumiko Sakamaki; Noriko Iida; Hideki Nakajima; Yasuyuki Oyake; Sadanori Ohtsuka; Yumiko Tanaka; Manabu Minami; Shigeyuki Watanabe; Kazutaka Aonuma
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2010-02-11

6.  Reference left atrial dimensions and volumes by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Alicia M Maceira; Juan Cosín-Sales; Michael Roughton; Sanjay K Prasad; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging assessment of regional and global left atrial function before and after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  David Nori; Gilbert Raff; Vikesh Gupta; Ralph Gentry; Judith Boura; David E Haines
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Roy Beinart; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-06

9.  Electrocardiographic detection of hypertensive left atrial enlargement in the presence of obesity: re-calibration against cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  J C L Rodrigues; T Erdei; A G Dastidar; B McIntyre; A E Burchell; L E K Ratcliffe; E C Hart; M C K Hamilton; J F R Paton; A K Nightingale; N E Manghat
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.012

10.  Left Ventricular Systolic Function Assessed by Global Longitudinal Strain is Impaired in Atrial Fibrillation Compared to Sinus Rhythm.

Authors:  Bue F Ross Agner; Michael G Katz; Zachary R Williams; Ulrik Dixen; Gorm B Jensen; Karl Q Schwarz
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2017-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.