BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate whether specialized supportive enteral and parenteral feeding have superior effects compared to oral nutrition on recovery during long-term postoperative treatment of cancer patients with preoperative weight loss and reduced maximum exercise capacity. METHODS:One hundred twenty-six patients referred for resection of the esophagus (n = 48), stomach (n = 28), or pancreas (n = 50) were considered to be included before operation. Included patients (n = 80) received supportive enteral or parenteral nutrition postoperatively at home corresponding to 1000 kcal/d until the patients did not wish to continue with artificial nutrition for any reason. Patients randomized to oral nutrition only served as control subjects. Caloric intake, body composition (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry), and respiratory gas exchanges at rest and during exercise were measured including health-related quality of life. RESULTS:Survival and hospital stay did not differ among the groups, whereas overall complications were higher on artificial nutrition (P < .05). Changes in resting energy expenditure and biochemical tests did not differ during follow-up among the groups. Body weight and whole body fat declined similarly over time in all groups (P < .005), whereas lean body mass was unchanged during follow-up compared to preoperative values. Maximum exercise capacity and maximum oxygen consumption were normalized within 6 months postoperatively in all groups. There was no difference in recovery of food intake among the groups. Parenteral feeding was associated with the highest rate of nutrition-related complications, whereas enteral feeding reduced quality of life most extensively. CONCLUSION:After major surgery, specialized supportive enteral and parenteral nutrition are not superior to oral nutrition only when guided by a dietitian.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate whether specialized supportive enteral and parenteral feeding have superior effects compared to oral nutrition on recovery during long-term postoperative treatment of cancerpatients with preoperative weight loss and reduced maximum exercise capacity. METHODS: One hundred twenty-six patients referred for resection of the esophagus (n = 48), stomach (n = 28), or pancreas (n = 50) were considered to be included before operation. Included patients (n = 80) received supportive enteral or parenteral nutrition postoperatively at home corresponding to 1000 kcal/d until the patients did not wish to continue with artificial nutrition for any reason. Patients randomized to oral nutrition only served as control subjects. Caloric intake, body composition (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry), and respiratory gas exchanges at rest and during exercise were measured including health-related quality of life. RESULTS: Survival and hospital stay did not differ among the groups, whereas overall complications were higher on artificial nutrition (P < .05). Changes in resting energy expenditure and biochemical tests did not differ during follow-up among the groups. Body weight and whole body fat declined similarly over time in all groups (P < .005), whereas lean body mass was unchanged during follow-up compared to preoperative values. Maximum exercise capacity and maximum oxygen consumption were normalized within 6 months postoperatively in all groups. There was no difference in recovery of food intake among the groups. Parenteral feeding was associated with the highest rate of nutrition-related complications, whereas enteral feeding reduced quality of life most extensively. CONCLUSION: After major surgery, specialized supportive enteral and parenteral nutrition are not superior to oral nutrition only when guided by a dietitian.
Authors: Marco Scarpa; Francesco Cavallin; Giulia Noaro; Eleonora Pinto; Rita Alfieri; Matteo Cagol; Carlo Castoro Journal: Chin J Cancer Res Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: Christiaan Seimeon Michael Stevens; Betty Lemon; Gina A Lockwood; John N Waldron; Andrea Bezjak; Jolie Ringash Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-06-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Ronald Chow; Eduardo Bruera; Jann Arends; Declan Walsh; Florian Strasser; Elisabeth Isenring; Egidio G Del Fabbro; Alex Molassiotis; Monica Krishnan; Leonard Chiu; Nicholas Chiu; Stephanie Chan; Tian Yi Tang; Henry Lam; Michael Lock; Carlo DeAngelis Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-12-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Georgia Herbert; Rachel Perry; Henning Keinke Andersen; Charlotte Atkinson; Christopher Penfold; Stephen J Lewis; Andrew R Ness; Steven Thomas Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-07-22
Authors: Georgia Herbert; Rachel Perry; Henning Keinke Andersen; Charlotte Atkinson; Christopher Penfold; Stephen J Lewis; Andrew R Ness; Steven Thomas Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-10-24