Literature DB >> 15880193

[Notes on euthanasia].

Alejandro Goic1.   

Abstract

In the Judeo-Christian tradition, human life is held to be sacred, a semblance of the divine and a gift from God which the individual cannot dispose of at his or her own will. Hence, these monotheistic religions have made of the crime of murder a transgression of God's own commandment not to kill and have extended the applicability of this commandment to the practice of euthanasia and suicide. On the other hand, some non-religious traditions offer plausible reasons favoring euthanasia. This is a delicate matter for physicians, since the Hippocratic tradition forbids euthanasia and because as care-givers they must also bear the psychological, moral and emotional burden of carrying it out. Physicians are trained to preserve life but not to bring it to an end. As human beings, they must always respect the principle of nonmaleficence, and as physicians they must always respect as well the principle of beneficence. It is difficult to accept the fact that ending a human life can be an act of beneficence. In order to differentiate between passive and active euthanasia, the concept of proportionality of medical acts must be brought into consideration. For instance, using high doses of opiates to alleviate pain or withholding the use of an extraordinary method of treatment are not passive acts aimed at ending the life of a terminally ill patient, but medical acts that are reasonable, judicious and proportionate to the condition and irreversibility of a patient's illness. Therefore, so-called passive euthanasia cannot be considered the same as euthanasia. On the other hand, medically assisted suicide is a deceitful form of active euthanasia. The aim of this act is to cause death and the physician is morally responsible for such a death, since he is providing the means for bringing a human life to an end. Many times the desire to die expressed by terminally ill elderly and helpless patients is a request for help and an expression of reproach against a society that allows for their abandonment and neglect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15880193     DOI: 10.4067/s0034-98872005000300014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Med Chil        ISSN: 0034-9887            Impact factor:   0.553


  1 in total

1.  [Ethical arguments for and against the participation of the medical profession in assisted death: analysis of the Ethics Department of the Chilean Medical Association].

Authors:  SofÍa P Salas; Rodrigo A Salinas; Mauricio Besio; Constanza Micolich; AnamarÍa Arriagada; Adelio Misseroni Raddatz; Carlos Y Valenzuela; Fernando Novoa; Gladys BÓrquez EstefÓ
Journal:  Rev Med Chil       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 0.553

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.