Literature DB >> 15879752

Reliability testing of a new scar assessment tool, Matching Assessment of Scars and Photographs (MAPS).

Margot Masters1, Margaret McMahon, Birgit Svens.   

Abstract

A new scar-assessment tool, the Matching Assessment of Scars and Photographs (MAPS), which uses a set of reference photographs, a numeric scale, and location technique, was tested for its reliability in two stages. First, using five adults, three raters assessed 32 burns scars twice within 3 days. Subsequently, reliability was tested during a 6-month time frame, emphasizing the process of localizing test areas as scars changed and raters forgot the previous assessment. Three raters, from a pool of five, each made three assessments on 29 scars in seven subjects, on average 8 weeks apart. Inter-rater reliability was tested, using Kendall's Tau C and intraclass correlations, respectively, for stages 1 and 2. Agreement was good for border height (0.63-0.70 and 0.78), moderate to good for thickness (0.60-0.74 and 0.81), and good for color (0.55-0.71 and 0.79), whereas for surface it was fair (0.25-0.38 and 0.40). The localization technique was reliable (accuracy within 3 mm) in 93% to 96% of recordings. The MAPS tool is considered ready for clinical use.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15879752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil        ISSN: 0273-8481


  7 in total

1.  Wearable sensors of the elasticity of deeper skin.

Authors:  Levent Beker
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 25.671

2.  What score on the Vancouver Scar Scale constitutes a hypertrophic scar? Results from a survey of North American burn-care providers.

Authors:  Callie M Thompson; Ravi F Sood; Shari Honari; Gretchen J Carrougher; Nicole S Gibran
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.744

3.  Reliable scar scoring system to assess photographs of burn patients.

Authors:  Gabriel A Mecott; Celeste C Finnerty; David N Herndon; Ahmed M Al-Mousawi; Ludwik K Branski; Sachin Hegde; Robert Kraft; Felicia N Williams; Susana A Maldonado; Haidy G Rivero; Noe Rodriguez-Escobar; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Coherency image analysis to quantify collagen architecture: implications in scar assessment.

Authors:  T D Clemons; M Bradshaw; P Toshniwal; N Chaudhari; A W Stevenson; J Lynch; M W Fear; F M Wood; K Swaminathan Iyer
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.036

5.  Cutaneous scarring: a clinical review.

Authors:  Richard Baker; Fulvio Urso-Baiarda; Claire Linge; Adriaan Grobbelaar
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2010-02-10

6.  Free Flap Donor Site Reconstruction: A Prospective Case Series Using an Optimized Polyurethane Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix.

Authors:  Marcus J D Wagstaff; Bradley J Schmitt; Yugesh Caplash; John E Greenwood
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2015-06-26

7.  A biodegradable polyurethane dermal matrix in reconstruction of free flap donor sites: a pilot study.

Authors:  Marcus J D Wagstaff; Bradley J Schmitt; Patrick Coghlan; James P Finkemeyer; Yugesh Caplash; John E Greenwood
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2015-04-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.