Literature DB >> 15879496

Transendocardial and transepicardial intramyocardial fibroblast growth factor-2 administration: myocardial and tissue distribution.

Roger J Laham1, Mark Post, Mehrdad Rezaee, Laurel Donnell-Fink, Joanna J Wykrzykowska, Seung U Lee, Donald S Baim, Frank W Sellke.   

Abstract

Effective local delivery to the heart remains an obstacle to successful therapeutic application of a number of drugs and biological agents. This study was designed to study and optimize the delivery characteristics of transendocardial intramyocardial (IM) administration, determine myocardial deposition and retention over time, and compare it to transepicardial IM injection. Thirty-nine pigs were used for the study (15 for catheter optimization, 15 for transendocardial IM delivery, and 9 for transepicardial IM delivery). (125)I-Fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2) (25 microCi) was used as the prototype molecule. Tissue and myocardial distribution was determined at 1 and 24 h and 7 days. Using 1-h (125)I-FGF2 myocardial deposition as a parameter for delivery efficiency, the optimal needle length and delivery volume for transendocardial based delivery were determined to be 6 mm and 0.1 ml, respectively. Using these parameters for endocardial delivery, (125)I-FGF2 cardiac activity was 18.01 +/- 3.84% of delivered activity at 1 h, 11.65 +/- 5.17% at 24 h, and 2.32 +/- 0.87% at 7 days in ischemic animals. Studies in nonischemic animals produced similar results. For transepicardial delivery, (125)I-FGF2 cardiac-specific activity was 23.14 +/- 12.67% for the 6-mm needle, declining to 12.32 +/- 8.50% at 24 h, and did not significantly differ from values obtained following transendocardial delivery. Thus, optimized transendocardial intramyocardial delivery using Biosense guidance results in efficient delivery of FGF2 to the target myocardium that is comparable with transepicardial delivery, both providing markedly higher myocardial deposition and retention and lower systemic recirculation of FGF2 than intracoronary, intrapericardial, or intravenous delivery. However, myocardial distribution is limited to injection sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15879496     DOI: 10.1124/dmd.104.002774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos        ISSN: 0090-9556            Impact factor:   3.922


  13 in total

1.  Percutaneous microembolization of the left coronary artery to model ischemic heart disease in rats.

Authors:  Allard Wagenaar; Rob F Wiegerinck; Viviane V T Heijnen; Mark J Post
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.625

2.  Degradable PLGA scaffolds with basic fibroblast growth factor: experimental studies in myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Xiao-Cheng Liu; Jian Zhao; Xiang-Rong Kong; Rong-Fang Shi; Xiao-Bin Zhao; Cun-Xian Song; Tian-Jun Liu; Feng Lu
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2009

Review 3.  Angiomyogenesis for myocardial repair.

Authors:  Husnain Kh Haider; Syed Ali Akbar; Muhammad Ashraf
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 4.  Targeted gene therapy for the treatment of heart failure.

Authors:  Kleopatra Rapti; Antoine H Chaanine; Roger J Hajjar
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.223

5.  Nanoparticles administered intrapericardially enhance payload myocardial distribution and retention.

Authors:  Victor Segura-Ibarra; Francisca E Cara; Suhong Wu; David A Iruegas-Nunez; Sufen Wang; Mauro Ferrari; Arturas Ziemys; Miguel Valderrabano; Elvin Blanco
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2017-07-09       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  Micro- and Nanoparticles for Treating Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  S Suarez; A Almutairi; K L Christman
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.843

7.  Reprogramming the specificity of sortase enzymes.

Authors:  Brent M Dorr; Hyun Ok Ham; Chihui An; Elliot L Chaikof; David R Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Autologous cardiomyotissue implantation promotes myocardial regeneration, decreases infarct size, and improves left ventricular function.

Authors:  Joanna J Wykrzykowska; Audrey Rosinberg; Seung U Lee; Pierre Voisine; Guifu Wu; Evan Appelbaum; Munir Boodhwani; Frank W Sellke; Roger J Laham
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Myocardial drug distribution generated from local epicardial application: potential impact of cardiac capillary perfusion in a swine model using epinephrine.

Authors:  Mikhail Y Maslov; Elazer R Edelman; Matthew J Pezone; Abraham E Wei; Matthew G Wakim; Michael R Murray; Hisashi Tsukada; Iraklis S Gerogiannis; Adam Groothuis; Mark A Lovich
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 9.776

10.  Comparison of in leakage from labeled endocardial and epicardial cells: impact on modeling viability of cells to be transplanted into myocardium.

Authors:  Kimberley J Blackwood; Jane Sykes; Lela Deans; Gerald Wisenberg; Frank S Prato
Journal:  Int J Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.