Literature DB >> 15879358

Seasonality of growth response to GH therapy in prepubertal children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency.

C Land1, W F Blum, A Stabrey, E Schoenau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Longitudinal growth of children exhibits seasonal variation. In both healthy children and in children with growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) receiving GH therapy, growth rate is maximal during spring and summer. In the present study, we analyzed the growth response to GH therapy in children with GHD as a function of the season when therapy was started. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Anthropometric measurements and biochemical analyses of GH secretion status and bone formation were longitudinally assessed in a cohort of 52 prepubertal children with GHD (14 girls, mean age 7.6 years) who were treated with a fixed dose of GH (0.025 mg/kg/day).
RESULTS: Auxological assessments over the 2-year observation period revealed a significantly better growth response to GH therapy in children who started therapy between the spring and summer (group 1) compared with children who started in the autumn or winter (group 2). The difference was largest in the initial 3-month treatment period (35%; P<0.01). The initial better gain in height of group 1 was sustained during the study period. Baseline peak GH levels during stimulation tests and insuin-like growth factor-I levels did not differ between the two groups. However, group 1 had significantly higher bone resorption and formation markers, either at the start or shortly after initiation of GH treatment. This suggests that children with GHD have higher bone turnover during spring and early summer, irrespective of GH therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, this study suggests that the season of GH initiation is a determinant of the initial growth response to GH replacement in prepubertal children with GHD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15879358     DOI: 10.1530/eje.1.01899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol        ISSN: 0804-4643            Impact factor:   6.664


  8 in total

1.  Seasonal variations in vitamin D in relation to growth in short prepubertal children before and during first year growth hormone treatment.

Authors:  B Andersson; D Swolin-Eide; B Kriström; L Gelander; P Magnusson; K Albertsson-Wikland
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Seasonal variations in growth and body composition of 8-11-y-old Danish children.

Authors:  Stine-Mathilde Dalskov; Christian Ritz; Anni Larnkjær; Camilla T Damsgaard; Rikke A Petersen; Louise B Sørensen; Mads F Hjorth; Ken K Ong; Arne Astrup; Christian Mølgaard; Kim F Michaelsen
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.756

3.  Hormone seasonality in medical records suggests circannual endocrine circuits.

Authors:  Avichai Tendler; Alon Bar; Netta Mendelsohn-Cohen; Omer Karin; Yael Korem Kohanim; Lior Maimon; Tomer Milo; Moriya Raz; Avi Mayo; Amos Tanay; Uri Alon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Regional Differences in Height, Weight, and Body Composition may Result from Photoperiodic Responses: An Ecological Analysis of Japanese Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Masana Yokoya; Aki Terada
Journal:  J Circadian Rhythms       Date:  2021-02-22

5.  The first-year growth response to growth hormone treatment predicts the long-term prepubertal growth response in children.

Authors:  Berit Kriström; Jovanna Dahlgren; Aimon Niklasson; Andreas F M Nierop; Kerstin Albertsson-Wikland
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Season of birth is associated with birth weight, pubertal timing, adult body size and educational attainment: a UK Biobank study.

Authors:  Felix R Day; Nita G Forouhi; Ken K Ong; John R B Perry
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2015-10-12

7.  Effect of summer daylight exposure and genetic background on growth in growth hormone-deficient children.

Authors:  C De Leonibus; P Chatelain; C Knight; P Clayton; A Stevens
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.550

8.  Day length may make geographical difference in body size and proportions: An ecological analysis of Japanese children and adolescents.

Authors:  Masana Yokoya; Yukito Higuchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.