Literature DB >> 15878917

Comparison of male and female meiotic segregation patterns in translocation heterozygotes: a case study in an animal model (Sus scrofa domestica L.).

A Pinton1, T Faraut, M Yerle, J Gruand, F Pellestor, A Ducos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The comparison of male and female meiotic segregation patterns for individuals carrying identical reciprocal translocations has been rarely reported in mammalian species. The main comparative study involving males and females with comparable genetic background has been performed in the mouse. Swine is another relevant animal model species for meiotic studies. Here we present the segregation patterns determined for sows carrying one of the two following reciprocal translocations: 38, XX, rcp(3;15)(q27;q13), and 38, XX, rcp(12;14)(q13;q21). These segregation data were compared to those previously obtained for closely related boars carrying the same balanced chromosomal rearrangements.
METHODS: Dual colour in situ hybridization of whole chromosome painting probes was carried out on metaphases of in vitro-matured oocytes II. Segregation results were obtained for 118 and 206 metaphases II respectively for the two translocations.
RESULTS: Significant differences between sexes were demonstrated for both rearrangements. For instance, for the 3/15 translocation, the chromosomally unbalanced gametes were of different origin: preponderance of the adjacent-I segregation in the male (31.4%), and of the adjacent-II (14.3%) and 3:1 (14.3%) segregations in females. For the 12/14 translocation, the proportion of balanced gametes was greater in males than in females (75.9 and 59.4% respectively).
CONCLUSION: This study is a new scientific contribution to compare the segregation patterns of male and female carriers of identical chromosomal rearrangements. The results obtained are consistent with those previously reported in mice. Hypotheses to interpret the observed differences between the two translocations, as well as between the male and female segregation patterns, are formulated and discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15878917     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  4 in total

Review 1.  Classical, Molecular, and Genomic Cytogenetics of the Pig, a Clinical Perspective.

Authors:  Brendan Donaldson; Daniel A F Villagomez; W Allan King
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  An advanced sheep (Ovis aries, 2n = 54) cytogenetic map and assignment of 88 new autosomal loci by fluorescence in situ hybridization and R-banding.

Authors:  G P Di Meo; A Perucatti; S Floriot; H Hayes; L Schibler; R Rullo; D Incarnato; L Ferretti; N Cockett; E Cribiu; J L Williams; A Eggen; L Iannuzzi
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Chromosomal Polymorphism and Speciation: The Case of the Genus Mazama (Cetartiodactyla; Cervidae).

Authors:  David Javier Galindo; Gabriela Siqueira Martins; Miluse Vozdova; Halina Cernohorska; Svatava Kubickova; Agda Maria Bernegossi; Dita Kadlcikova; Jiri Rubes; José Maurício Barbanti Duarte
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Resveratrol Ameliorates Intestinal Damage Challenged With Deoxynivalenol Through Mitophagy in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Yujian Huang; Changbing Zheng; Bo Song; Li Wang; Hao Xiao; Zongyong Jiang
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.