Literature DB >> 15878821

Changes in condylar long axis and skeletal stability after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with poly-L-lactic acid or titanium plate fixation.

K Ueki1, K Nakagawa, K Marukawa, D Takazakura, M Shimada, S Takatsuka, E Yamamoto.   

Abstract

This study was designed to assess skeletal stability after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSO) and fixation with a poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA) plate, as compared to that after BSSO and fixation with a titanium plate, and to analyze the change in the condylar long axis after these procedures. The study group comprised 40 patients who had mandibular prognathism (20, titanium group; 20, PLLA group). The groups were randomized to show similar distributions of preoperative SNB. All patients underwent BSSO setback by the Obwegeser method. Fixation was done with bent titanium plates or bent PLLA plates, applied in a similar manner. Lateral, frontal, and submental-vertical cephalograms were analyzed preoperatively and postoperatively. The maximum mouth opening range and the incidence of temporomandibular disorders were also evaluated. There was no significant difference in the right condylar angle or width between the two groups, but the left condylar angle and width, gonial angle, and ramus inclination differed significantly between them (P<0.05). SNA, SNB, and ANB were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in maximum mouth opening range or temporomandibular disorders. We conclude that the change in condylar angle after BSSO and fixation with a titanium plate is greater than that after BSSO and fixation with a PLLA plate, but skeletal stability related to the occlusion is similar for the two procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15878821     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  8 in total

1.  Synthesis and characterization of bioresorbable in situ crosslinkable ultra low molecular weight poly(lactide) macromer.

Authors:  Esmaiel Jabbari; Xuezhong He
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Bioabsorbable osteofixation for orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Young-Wook Park
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-02-19

3.  Comparative study on long-term stability in mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy: hydroxyapatite/poly-l-lactide mesh versus titanium miniplate.

Authors:  Young-Wook Park; Hyun-Sik Kang; Jang-Ha Lee
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-03-01

4.  Effect of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on morphologic parameters of temporomandibular joint in patients with mandibular prognathism.

Authors:  He-Di Ma; Jing-Heng Shu; Xu-Zhao Deng; Zhan Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Complications of absorbable fixation in maxillofacial surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liya Yang; Meibang Xu; Xiaolei Jin; Jiajie Xu; Jianjian Lu; Chao Zhang; Tian Tian; Li Teng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Temporomandibular Disorders: "Occlusion" Matters!

Authors:  Robert J A M de Kanter; Pasquale G F C M Battistuzzi; Gert-Jan Truin
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.037

7.  Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Analysis: The Changes in Condylar Position Pre- and Post-Orthognathic Surgery With Skeletal Class III Malocclusion.

Authors:  Abhinav Shrestha; Shao Hua Song; Han Nyein Aung; Jirayus Sangwatanakul; Nuo Zhou
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr 01       Impact factor: 1.172

Review 8.  Efficacy and morbidity of biodegradable versus titanium osteosyntheses in orthognathic surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Barzi Gareb; Nico B van Bakelen; Pieter U Dijkstra; Arjan Vissink; Ruud R M Bos; Baucke van Minnen
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.612

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.