C Hudon1, M Fortin, A Vanasse. 1. Department of Family Medicine, Sherbrooke University, Quebec, Canada. catherine.hudon@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to validate an instrument measuring the clinical burden of several medical problems in the same patient (multimorbidity), in a family practice context and, more specifically, to verify if trained nurses can score the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) from chart review. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A convenience sample of 40 patients was selected. The attending physicians scored the CIRS during clinical interview (CIRS-MD/I), then three nurses scored the CIRS during clinical interview (CIRS-NUR/I) and three other nurses scored the CIRS from chart review (CIRS-NUR/C) (interrater reliability). Two of these nurses scored the CIRS-NUR/C again 2 months later (intrarater reliability). RESULTS: For interrater reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.81 (0.70-0.89) for the CIRS-NUR/I and 0.78 (0.66-0.87) for the CIRS-NUR/C. The intrarater reliability of the CIRS-NUR/C was 0.89 (0.80-0.94) for one of the nurses and 0.80 (0.65-0.89) for the other. Concomitant validity of these two forms of CIRS with the CIRS-MD/I ranged from 0.73 to 0.84. CONCLUSION: The CIRS appears to be a reliable and valid instrument in a primary care context and trained nurses can score the CIRS from chart review.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to validate an instrument measuring the clinical burden of several medical problems in the same patient (multimorbidity), in a family practice context and, more specifically, to verify if trained nurses can score the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) from chart review. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A convenience sample of 40 patients was selected. The attending physicians scored the CIRS during clinical interview (CIRS-MD/I), then three nurses scored the CIRS during clinical interview (CIRS-NUR/I) and three other nurses scored the CIRS from chart review (CIRS-NUR/C) (interrater reliability). Two of these nurses scored the CIRS-NUR/C again 2 months later (intrarater reliability). RESULTS: For interrater reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.81 (0.70-0.89) for the CIRS-NUR/I and 0.78 (0.66-0.87) for the CIRS-NUR/C. The intrarater reliability of the CIRS-NUR/C was 0.89 (0.80-0.94) for one of the nurses and 0.80 (0.65-0.89) for the other. Concomitant validity of these two forms of CIRS with the CIRS-MD/I ranged from 0.73 to 0.84. CONCLUSION: The CIRS appears to be a reliable and valid instrument in a primary care context and trained nurses can score the CIRS from chart review.
Authors: Martin Fortin; Gina Bravo; Catherine Hudon; Lise Lapointe; José Almirall; Marie-France Dubois; Alain Vanasse Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Pauline Boeckxstaens; Bert Vaes; An De Sutter; Isabelle Aujoulat; Gijs van Pottelbergh; Catharina Matheï; Jean-Marie Degryse Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Tom Brett; Diane Elizabeth Arnold-Reed; Aurora Popescu; Bishoy Soliman; Max Kishor Bulsara; Hilary Fine; Geoff Bovell; Robert George Moorhead Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2013 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Frank Peters-Klimm; Cornelia U Kunz; Gunter Laux; Joachim Szecsenyi; Thomas Müller-Tasch Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2010-09-13 Impact factor: 3.186